optical fiber: has quality questions

Related concepts

Parents	fiber Weight: 0.76 , substrate Weight: 0.72 , light source Weight: 0.66 , structure Weight: 0.65
Siblings	amplifier Weight: 0.64 , silicon Weight: 0.36 , nylon Weight: 0.35 , polymer Weight: 0.35 , filament Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality questions	1.00
has quality good	0.76
is quality	0.76
has quality better	0.76
has quality bad	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.91

Plausible(structure, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Typical(optical fiber, has quality questions)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(light source, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Typical(optical fiber, has quality questions)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(fiber, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Typical(optical fiber, has quality questions)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.07

Plausible(optical fiber, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(fiber, has quality better)

0.02

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.07

Plausible(optical fiber, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(light source, has quality good)

0.01

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.07

Plausible(optical fiber, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Plausible(structure, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(light source, has quality good)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(fiber, has quality better)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(structure, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(nylon, has quality good)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(amplifier, has quality good)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(silicon, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.91

Plausible(structure, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

Remarkable(optical fiber, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Plausible(optical fiber, has quality questions)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(light source, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

Remarkable(optical fiber, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Plausible(optical fiber, has quality questions)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(fiber, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

Remarkable(optical fiber, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Plausible(optical fiber, has quality questions)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.36

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.07

Plausible(optical fiber, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

Remarkable(silicon, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(silicon, has quality good)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.07

Plausible(optical fiber, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

Remarkable(amplifier, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(amplifier, has quality good)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.07

Plausible(optical fiber, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

Remarkable(nylon, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Plausible(nylon, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.07

Plausible(optical fiber, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Salient(optical fiber, has quality questions)

Similarity expansion

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.07

Remarkable(optical fiber, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, has quality good)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.07

Salient(optical fiber, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Salient(optical fiber, has quality good)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.07

Remarkable(optical fiber, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, is quality)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.07

Plausible(optical fiber, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Plausible(optical fiber, has quality good)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.07

Salient(optical fiber, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Salient(optical fiber, is quality)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.07

Plausible(optical fiber, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Plausible(optical fiber, is quality)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.30

Typical(optical fiber, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Typical(optical fiber, has quality good)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.30

Typical(optical fiber, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(optical fiber, is quality)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.07

Salient(optical fiber, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Typical(optical fiber, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, has quality questions)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.07

Plausible(optical fiber, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Typical(optical fiber, has quality questions)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(light source, has quality good)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(fiber, has quality better)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(structure, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(silicon, has quality good)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(amplifier, has quality good)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(nylon, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.18

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.30

Typical(optical fiber, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(fiber, has quality better)

0.15

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.30

Typical(optical fiber, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(light source, has quality good)

0.13

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.30

Typical(optical fiber, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(structure, has quality good)