order: be followed in public services

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents injunction
Weight: 0.64
, agreement
Weight: 0.61
, protection
Weight: 0.60
, third party
Weight: 0.60
Siblings will
Weight: 0.60
, warrant
Weight: 0.59
, duty
Weight: 0.58
, writ
Weight: 0.58
, reservation
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
be followed in public services 1.00
be followed in unifomred public services 1.00
be followed in services 0.96
be followed in unifomred services 0.96
is followed 0.86
need followed 0.85
be followed in police 0.83
be made public 0.80
be important in community services 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(order, be followed in public services)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(duty, be important in community services)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(order, be followed in public services)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(will, be made public)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(order, be followed in public services)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(will, be made public)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(will, be made public)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(order, be followed in public services)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(duty, be important in community services)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(duty, be important in community services)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(order, be followed in public services)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(order, be followed in public services)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(order, be followed in public services)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(order, be followed in services)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(order, be followed in public services)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(order, be followed in services)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(order, be followed in public services)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(order, be followed in unifomred public services)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(order, be followed in public services)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(order, need followed)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(order, be followed in public services)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(order, be followed in unifomred public services)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(order, be followed in public services)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(order, is followed)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(order, be followed in public services)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(order, be followed in services)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(order, be followed in public services)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(order, be followed in police)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(order, be followed in public services)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(order, be followed in unifomred public services)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(order, be followed in public services)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(order, be followed in police)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(order, be followed in public services)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(order, be followed in police)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(order, be followed in public services)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(order, need followed)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(order, be followed in public services)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(order, is followed)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(order, be followed in public services)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(order, be followed in unifomred public services)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(order, be followed in public services)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(order, be followed in police)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(order, be followed in public services)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(order, be followed in services)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(order, be followed in public services)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(order, is followed)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(order, be followed in public services)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(order, need followed)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(order, be followed in public services)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(order, is followed)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(order, be followed in public services)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(order, need followed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(order, be followed in public services)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(order, be followed in public services)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(order, be followed in public services)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(order, be followed in public services)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(order, be followed in public services)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(order, be followed in public services)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(will, be made public)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(order, be followed in public services)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(duty, be important in community services)