order: be necessary for success of child

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents injunction
Weight: 0.64
, agreement
Weight: 0.61
, protection
Weight: 0.60
, third party
Weight: 0.60
Siblings will
Weight: 0.60
, warrant
Weight: 0.59
, duty
Weight: 0.58
, writ
Weight: 0.58
, reservation
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
be necessary for success of child 1.00
be necessary for success 0.92
be critical to success 0.84
be critical to success of market system 0.80
is necessary 0.78
is successful 0.76
be vital for life 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(third party, is successful)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(order, be necessary for success of child)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(protection, be critical to success of market system)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(order, be necessary for success of child)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(protection, be critical to success)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(order, be necessary for success of child)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(agreement, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(order, be necessary for success of child)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(protection, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(order, be necessary for success of child)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(order, be necessary for success of child)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(protection, is necessary)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(order, be necessary for success of child)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(agreement, is necessary)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(order, be necessary for success of child)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(protection, be critical to success)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(order, be necessary for success of child)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(protection, be critical to success of market system)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(order, be necessary for success of child)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(third party, is successful)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(order, be necessary for success of child)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(protection, be critical to success of market system)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(order, be necessary for success of child)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(protection, be critical to success)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(order, be necessary for success of child)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(third party, is successful)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(order, be necessary for success of child)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(agreement, is necessary)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(order, be necessary for success of child)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(protection, is necessary)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(order, be necessary for success of child)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(will, is necessary)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(order, be necessary for success of child)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(warrant, is necessary)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(third party, is successful)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(order, be necessary for success of child)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(order, be necessary for success of child)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(protection, be critical to success)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(order, be necessary for success of child)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(order, be necessary for success of child)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(protection, be critical to success of market system)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(order, be necessary for success of child)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(order, be necessary for success of child)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(agreement, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(order, be necessary for success of child)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(order, be necessary for success of child)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(protection, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(order, be necessary for success of child)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(order, be necessary for success of child)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(order, be necessary for success of child)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(warrant, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(warrant, is necessary)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(order, be necessary for success of child)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(will, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(will, is necessary)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(order, be necessary for success of child)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(order, be necessary for success of child)

Similarity expansion

0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(order, be necessary for success of child)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(order, be vital for life)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(order, be necessary for success of child)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(order, be vital for life)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(order, be necessary for success of child)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(order, be vital for life)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(order, be necessary for success of child)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(order, be vital for life)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(order, be necessary for success of child)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(order, be necessary for success of child)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(order, be necessary for success of child)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(order, be necessary for success of child)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(order, be necessary for success of child)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(order, be necessary for success of child)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(protection, is necessary)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(order, be necessary for success of child)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(agreement, is necessary)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(order, be necessary for success of child)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(protection, be critical to success)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(order, be necessary for success of child)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(protection, be critical to success of market system)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(order, be necessary for success of child)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(third party, is successful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(order, be necessary for success of child)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(warrant, is necessary)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(order, be necessary for success of child)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(will, is necessary)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(order, be necessary for success of child)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(protection, is necessary)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(order, be necessary for success of child)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(agreement, is necessary)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(order, be necessary for success of child)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(protection, be critical to success)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(order, be necessary for success of child)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(protection, be critical to success of market system)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(order, be necessary for success of child)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(third party, is successful)