ore: be considered nonrenewable resources

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents material
Weight: 0.66
, mineral
Weight: 0.66
, raw material
Weight: 0.62
, resource
Weight: 0.56
, rock
Weight: 0.53
Siblings iron ore
Weight: 0.89
, sulfide
Weight: 0.77
, coal
Weight: 0.62
, galena
Weight: 0.43

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered nonrenewable resources 1.00
is nonrenewable 0.95
be considered resources 0.87
is renewable resources 0.85
is non renewable resources 0.85
is non resources 0.81
has quality resources 0.78
be used as resource 0.78
is non-renewable resource 0.77
is renewable 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(mineral, is nonrenewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(ore, be considered nonrenewable resources)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(resource, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(ore, be considered nonrenewable resources)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(ore, be considered nonrenewable resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(mineral, is nonrenewable)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(ore, be considered nonrenewable resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(resource, is renewable)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(ore, be considered nonrenewable resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(mineral, is nonrenewable)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(ore, be considered nonrenewable resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(resource, is renewable)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(ore, be considered nonrenewable resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(iron ore, is renewable)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(ore, be considered nonrenewable resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(coal, is renewable)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(ore, be considered nonrenewable resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(coal, is nonrenewable)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(mineral, is nonrenewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(ore, be considered nonrenewable resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(ore, be considered nonrenewable resources)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(resource, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(ore, be considered nonrenewable resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(ore, be considered nonrenewable resources)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(ore, be considered nonrenewable resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(coal, is nonrenewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(coal, is nonrenewable)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(ore, be considered nonrenewable resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(coal, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(coal, is renewable)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(ore, be considered nonrenewable resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(iron ore, is renewable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(iron ore, is renewable)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(ore, be considered nonrenewable resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(ore, be considered nonrenewable resources)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(ore, be considered nonrenewable resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(ore, is nonrenewable)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(ore, be considered nonrenewable resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(ore, be considered resources)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(ore, be considered nonrenewable resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(ore, is non renewable resources)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(ore, be considered nonrenewable resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(ore, be considered resources)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(ore, be considered nonrenewable resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(ore, is renewable resources)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(ore, be considered nonrenewable resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(ore, is non resources)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(ore, be considered nonrenewable resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(ore, be used as resource)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(ore, be considered nonrenewable resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(ore, is non-renewable resource)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(ore, be considered nonrenewable resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(ore, is non renewable resources)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(ore, be considered nonrenewable resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(ore, is non resources)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(ore, be considered nonrenewable resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(ore, be considered resources)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(ore, be considered nonrenewable resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(ore, is non resources)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(ore, be considered nonrenewable resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(ore, has quality resources)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(ore, be considered nonrenewable resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(ore, is renewable)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(ore, be considered nonrenewable resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(ore, be used as resource)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(ore, be considered nonrenewable resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(ore, is non renewable resources)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(ore, be considered nonrenewable resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(ore, be used as resource)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(ore, be considered nonrenewable resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(ore, be considered resources)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(ore, be considered nonrenewable resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(ore, is non-renewable resource)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(ore, be considered nonrenewable resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(ore, is renewable resources)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(ore, be considered nonrenewable resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(ore, be used as resource)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(ore, be considered nonrenewable resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(ore, is renewable resources)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(ore, be considered nonrenewable resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(ore, is non-renewable resource)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(ore, be considered nonrenewable resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(ore, is non resources)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(ore, be considered nonrenewable resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(ore, is renewable resources)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(ore, be considered nonrenewable resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(ore, is nonrenewable)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(ore, be considered nonrenewable resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(ore, is non renewable resources)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(ore, be considered nonrenewable resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(ore, has quality resources)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(ore, be considered nonrenewable resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(ore, is nonrenewable)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(ore, be considered nonrenewable resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(ore, has quality resources)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(ore, be considered nonrenewable resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(ore, is renewable)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(ore, be considered nonrenewable resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(ore, is non-renewable resource)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(ore, be considered nonrenewable resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(ore, has quality resources)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(ore, be considered nonrenewable resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(ore, is nonrenewable)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(ore, be considered nonrenewable resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(ore, is renewable)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(ore, be considered nonrenewable resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(ore, is renewable)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(ore, be considered nonrenewable resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(ore, be considered nonrenewable resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(ore, be considered nonrenewable resources)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(ore, be considered nonrenewable resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(ore, be considered nonrenewable resources)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(ore, be considered nonrenewable resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(mineral, is nonrenewable)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(ore, be considered nonrenewable resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(resource, is renewable)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(ore, be considered nonrenewable resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(coal, is nonrenewable)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(ore, be considered nonrenewable resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(coal, is renewable)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(ore, be considered nonrenewable resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(iron ore, is renewable)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.10
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(ore, be considered nonrenewable resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(mineral, is nonrenewable)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(ore, be considered nonrenewable resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(resource, is renewable)