ore: be considered resources

Related concepts

Parents	material Weight: 0.66 , mineral Weight: 0.66 , raw material Weight: 0.62 , resource Weight: 0.56 , rock Weight: 0.53
Siblings	iron ore Weight: 0.89 , sulfide Weight: 0.77 , coal Weight: 0.62 , galena Weight: 0.43

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be considered resources	1.00
is non resources	0.90
has quality resources	0.89
be considered nonrenewable resources	0.87
is non-renewable resource	0.84
is renewable resources	0.83
be used as resource	0.83
is non renewable resources	0.83
has quality resource	0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.54

Plausible(mineral, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Typical(ore, be considered resources)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(resource, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Typical(ore, be considered resources)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(ore, be considered resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Plausible(resource, has quality resource)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(ore, be considered resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Plausible(mineral, has quality resource)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(ore, be considered resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(resource, has quality resource)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(ore, be considered resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Remarkable(mineral, has quality resource)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(ore, be considered resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(iron ore, has quality resource)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.54

Plausible(mineral, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

Remarkable(ore, be considered resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Plausible(ore, be considered resources)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(resource, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

Remarkable(ore, be considered resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Plausible(ore, be considered resources)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(ore, be considered resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

Remarkable(iron ore, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(iron ore, has quality resource)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(ore, be considered resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Salient(ore, be considered resources)

Similarity expansion

0.76

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.97

Remarkable(ore, be considered resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Remarkable(ore, is non resources)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.97

Remarkable(ore, be considered resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(ore, has quality resources)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.97

Remarkable(ore, be considered resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(ore, be considered nonrenewable resources)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.97

Remarkable(ore, be considered resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Remarkable(ore, is non-renewable resource)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.02

Typical(ore, be considered resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Typical(ore, be used as resource)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.97

Remarkable(ore, be considered resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(ore, is non renewable resources)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.48

Salient(ore, be considered resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Salient(ore, is non resources)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.97

Remarkable(ore, be considered resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(ore, is renewable resources)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.97

Remarkable(ore, be considered resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(ore, be used as resource)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(ore, be considered resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Plausible(ore, is non resources)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.02

Typical(ore, be considered resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(ore, be considered nonrenewable resources)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.97

Remarkable(ore, be considered resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(ore, has quality resource)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.48

Salient(ore, be considered resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Salient(ore, is non renewable resources)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(ore, be considered resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Plausible(ore, be used as resource)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.48

Salient(ore, be considered resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Salient(ore, is non-renewable resource)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(ore, be considered resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Plausible(ore, be considered nonrenewable resources)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(ore, be considered resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Plausible(ore, is non renewable resources)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.02

Typical(ore, be considered resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Typical(ore, is non resources)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.48

Salient(ore, be considered resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Salient(ore, be used as resource)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.48

Salient(ore, be considered resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Salient(ore, be considered nonrenewable resources)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(ore, be considered resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Plausible(ore, is non-renewable resource)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.48

Salient(ore, be considered resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Salient(ore, is renewable resources)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.02

Typical(ore, be considered resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Typical(ore, is renewable resources)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(ore, be considered resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Plausible(ore, is renewable resources)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.48

Salient(ore, be considered resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Salient(ore, has quality resources)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.02

Typical(ore, be considered resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(ore, is non renewable resources)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(ore, be considered resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Plausible(ore, has quality resources)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.48

Salient(ore, be considered resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Salient(ore, has quality resource)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.02

Typical(ore, be considered resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(ore, has quality resource)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.02

Typical(ore, be considered resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(ore, has quality resources)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(ore, be considered resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Plausible(ore, has quality resource)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.02

Typical(ore, be considered resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Typical(ore, is non-renewable resource)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.48

Salient(ore, be considered resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Typical(ore, be considered resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(ore, be considered resources)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(ore, be considered resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Typical(ore, be considered resources)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(ore, be considered resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Typical(mineral, has quality resource)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(ore, be considered resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(resource, has quality resource)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(ore, be considered resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(iron ore, has quality resource)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.02

Typical(ore, be considered resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Typical(mineral, has quality resource)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.02

Typical(ore, be considered resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(resource, has quality resource)