oregon: be better than california

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents region
Weight: 0.59
, program
Weight: 0.59
, california
Weight: 0.57
, state
Weight: 0.57
, place
Weight: 0.57
Siblings san jose
Weight: 0.60
, florida
Weight: 0.35
, arkansas
Weight: 0.34
, alaska
Weight: 0.34
, missouri
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than california 1.00
get to tax california income 0.81
be called oregon 0.78
be colder than tennessee 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(oregon, be better than california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(oregon, be better than california)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(oregon, be better than california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(oregon, get to tax california income)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(oregon, be better than california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(oregon, be called oregon)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(oregon, be better than california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(oregon, be colder than tennessee)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(oregon, be better than california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(oregon, get to tax california income)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(oregon, be better than california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(oregon, be called oregon)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(oregon, be better than california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(oregon, be called oregon)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(oregon, be better than california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(oregon, be colder than tennessee)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(oregon, be better than california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(oregon, be called oregon)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(oregon, be better than california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(oregon, be colder than tennessee)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(oregon, be better than california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(oregon, get to tax california income)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(oregon, be better than california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(oregon, be colder than tennessee)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(oregon, be better than california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(oregon, get to tax california income)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(oregon, be better than california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(oregon, be better than california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(oregon, be better than california)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(oregon, be better than california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(oregon, be better than california)