oreo: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents brand
Weight: 0.59
, cookie
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.57
, company
Weight: 0.55
, sweet
Weight: 0.47
Siblings pepsi
Weight: 0.34
, gravy
Weight: 0.33
, mcdonalds
Weight: 0.33
, spaghetti sauce
Weight: 0.33
, english muffin
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
is quality 0.87
taste good 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(cookie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(oreo, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(brand, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(oreo, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(cookie, taste good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(oreo, has quality bad)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(sweet, taste good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(oreo, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(oreo, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(brand, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(oreo, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(cookie, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(oreo, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(sweet, taste good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(oreo, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(cookie, taste good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(oreo, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(cookie, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(oreo, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(brand, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(oreo, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(cookie, taste good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(oreo, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(sweet, taste good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(oreo, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(oreo, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(gravy, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(oreo, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(english muffin, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(oreo, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(pepsi, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(oreo, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(oreo, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(gravy, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(oreo, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(english muffin, taste good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(oreo, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, taste good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(cookie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(oreo, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(oreo, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(brand, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(oreo, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(oreo, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(cookie, taste good)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(oreo, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(oreo, has quality bad)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(sweet, taste good)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(oreo, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(oreo, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(oreo, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(gravy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(gravy, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(oreo, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(mcdonalds, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(oreo, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(gravy, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(gravy, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(oreo, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(mcdonalds, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(oreo, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(pepsi, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(pepsi, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(oreo, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(english muffin, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(english muffin, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(oreo, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(mcdonalds, taste good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, taste good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(oreo, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(english muffin, taste good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(english muffin, taste good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(oreo, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(oreo, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(oreo, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(oreo, has quality good)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(oreo, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(oreo, has quality good)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(oreo, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(oreo, has quality good)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(oreo, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(oreo, is quality)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(oreo, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(oreo, is quality)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(oreo, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(oreo, is quality)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(oreo, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(oreo, taste good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(oreo, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(oreo, taste good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(oreo, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(oreo, taste good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(oreo, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(oreo, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(oreo, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(oreo, is quality)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(oreo, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(oreo, taste good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(oreo, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(oreo, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(oreo, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(oreo, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(oreo, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(oreo, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(sweet, taste good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(oreo, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(brand, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(oreo, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(cookie, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(oreo, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(cookie, taste good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(oreo, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(gravy, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(oreo, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(gravy, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(oreo, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(oreo, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(oreo, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(pepsi, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(oreo, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, taste good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(oreo, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(english muffin, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(oreo, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(english muffin, taste good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(oreo, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(brand, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(oreo, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(cookie, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(oreo, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(sweet, taste good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(oreo, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(cookie, taste good)