oreo: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents brand
Weight: 0.59
, cookie
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.57
, company
Weight: 0.55
, sweet
Weight: 0.47
Siblings pepsi
Weight: 0.34
, gravy
Weight: 0.33
, mcdonalds
Weight: 0.33
, spaghetti sauce
Weight: 0.33
, english muffin
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
is quality 0.91
taste good 0.79
is best 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(cookie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(oreo, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(brand, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(oreo, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(cookie, taste good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(oreo, has quality good)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(sweet, taste good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(oreo, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(oreo, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(brand, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(oreo, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(cookie, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(oreo, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(sweet, taste good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(oreo, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(cookie, taste good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(oreo, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(cookie, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(oreo, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(brand, has quality good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(oreo, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(cookie, taste good)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(oreo, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(sweet, taste good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(oreo, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(oreo, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(gravy, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(oreo, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(english muffin, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(oreo, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(pepsi, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(oreo, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(english muffin, taste good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(oreo, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(oreo, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(pepsi, is best)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(oreo, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(gravy, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(oreo, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, taste good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(cookie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(oreo, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(oreo, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(brand, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(oreo, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(oreo, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(cookie, taste good)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(oreo, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(oreo, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(sweet, taste good)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(oreo, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(oreo, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(oreo, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(gravy, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(gravy, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(oreo, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(mcdonalds, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(oreo, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(pepsi, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(pepsi, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(oreo, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(english muffin, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(english muffin, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(oreo, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(gravy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(gravy, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(oreo, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(mcdonalds, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(oreo, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(mcdonalds, taste good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, taste good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(oreo, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(english muffin, taste good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(english muffin, taste good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(oreo, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(pepsi, is best)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(pepsi, is best)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(oreo, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(oreo, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(oreo, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(oreo, has quality bad)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(oreo, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(oreo, has quality bad)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(oreo, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(oreo, is quality)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(oreo, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(oreo, has quality bad)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(oreo, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(oreo, is quality)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(oreo, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(oreo, is quality)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(oreo, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(oreo, has quality bad)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(oreo, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(oreo, taste good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(oreo, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(oreo, is best)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(oreo, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(oreo, taste good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(oreo, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(oreo, taste good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(oreo, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(oreo, is quality)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(oreo, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(oreo, is best)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(oreo, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(oreo, is best)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(oreo, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(oreo, taste good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(oreo, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(oreo, is best)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(oreo, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(oreo, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(oreo, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(oreo, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(oreo, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(oreo, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(sweet, taste good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(oreo, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(brand, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(oreo, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(cookie, has quality good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(oreo, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(cookie, taste good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(oreo, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(gravy, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(oreo, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(gravy, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(oreo, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(oreo, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(oreo, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, taste good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(oreo, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(pepsi, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(oreo, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(english muffin, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(oreo, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(pepsi, is best)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(oreo, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(english muffin, taste good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(oreo, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(brand, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(oreo, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(cookie, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(oreo, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(sweet, taste good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(oreo, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(cookie, taste good)