organelle: be present in animals

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cell membrane
Weight: 0.75
, structure
Weight: 0.58
, process
Weight: 0.56
, cargo
Weight: 0.49
Siblings lysosome
Weight: 0.70
, cell wall
Weight: 0.66
, ribosome
Weight: 0.63
, nucleus
Weight: 0.61
, nucleolus
Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property Similarity
be present in animals 1.00
help animals 0.85
be present in plants 0.83
be absent in animals 0.82
has time present 0.80
be present in prokaryotes 0.77
be in animal cell work 0.77
be in animal cells 0.77
be helpful to cats 0.76
be present in plant cells 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(structure, help animals)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(organelle, be present in animals)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(cell membrane, be helpful to cats)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(organelle, be present in animals)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(organelle, be present in animals)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(cell membrane, be helpful to cats)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(organelle, be present in animals)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(structure, help animals)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(organelle, be present in animals)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(cell membrane, be helpful to cats)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(organelle, be present in animals)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(structure, help animals)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(organelle, be present in animals)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(cell wall, be absent in animals)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(organelle, be present in animals)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(cell wall, be present in plants)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(organelle, be present in animals)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(cell wall, be present in plant cells)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(organelle, be present in animals)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(lysosome, be in animal cells)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(organelle, be present in animals)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(ribosome, be in animal cells)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(structure, help animals)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(organelle, be present in animals)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(organelle, be present in animals)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(cell membrane, be helpful to cats)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(organelle, be present in animals)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(organelle, be present in animals)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(organelle, be present in animals)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(cell wall, be absent in animals)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(cell wall, be absent in animals)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(organelle, be present in animals)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(ribosome, be in animal cells)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(ribosome, be in animal cells)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(organelle, be present in animals)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(lysosome, be in animal cells)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(lysosome, be in animal cells)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(organelle, be present in animals)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(cell wall, be present in plants)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(cell wall, be present in plants)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(organelle, be present in animals)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(cell wall, be present in plant cells)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(cell wall, be present in plant cells)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(organelle, be present in animals)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(organelle, be present in animals)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(organelle, be present in animals)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(organelle, be present in plants)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(organelle, be present in animals)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(organelle, be in animal cells)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(organelle, be present in animals)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(organelle, be in animal cell work)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(organelle, be present in animals)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(organelle, be in animal cells)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(organelle, be present in animals)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(organelle, be present in plants)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(organelle, be present in animals)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(organelle, be in animal cells)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(organelle, be present in animals)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(organelle, be present in plants)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(organelle, be present in animals)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(organelle, be present in plants)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(organelle, be present in animals)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(organelle, be in animal cells)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(organelle, be present in animals)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(organelle, be in animal cell work)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(organelle, be present in animals)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(organelle, be in animal cell work)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(organelle, be present in animals)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(organelle, be in animal cell work)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(organelle, be present in animals)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(organelle, be present in animals)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(organelle, be present in animals)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(organelle, be present in animals)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(organelle, be present in animals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(organelle, be present in animals)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(cell membrane, be helpful to cats)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(organelle, be present in animals)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(structure, help animals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(organelle, be present in animals)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(ribosome, be in animal cells)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(organelle, be present in animals)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(lysosome, be in animal cells)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(organelle, be present in animals)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(cell wall, be absent in animals)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(organelle, be present in animals)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(cell wall, be present in plants)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(organelle, be present in animals)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(cell wall, be present in plant cells)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(organelle, be present in animals)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(cell membrane, be helpful to cats)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(organelle, be present in animals)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(structure, help animals)