organelle: be present in plants

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cell membrane
Weight: 0.75
, structure
Weight: 0.58
, process
Weight: 0.56
, cargo
Weight: 0.49
Siblings lysosome
Weight: 0.70
, cell wall
Weight: 0.66
, ribosome
Weight: 0.63
, nucleus
Weight: 0.61
, nucleolus
Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property Similarity
be present in plants 1.00
be present in plant cells 0.88
be present in plant cell 0.88
be needed in plants 0.87
be essential for plants 0.84
be found in plant 0.83
be present in animals 0.83
help plant live 0.82
serve in plant 0.81
has time present 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(organelle, be present in plants)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(cell wall, serve in plant)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(organelle, be present in plants)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(cell wall, be present in plants)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(organelle, be present in plants)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(cell wall, help plant live)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(organelle, be present in plants)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(cell wall, be present in plant cells)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(organelle, be present in plants)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(cell wall, be present in plant cell)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(organelle, be present in plants)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(cell wall, be needed in plants)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(organelle, be present in plants)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(cell wall, be essential for plants)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(organelle, be present in plants)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(cell wall, be present in plants)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(cell wall, be present in plants)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(organelle, be present in plants)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(cell wall, be needed in plants)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(cell wall, be needed in plants)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(organelle, be present in plants)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(cell wall, serve in plant)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(cell wall, serve in plant)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(organelle, be present in plants)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(cell wall, be essential for plants)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(cell wall, be essential for plants)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(organelle, be present in plants)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(cell wall, be present in plant cell)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(cell wall, be present in plant cell)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(organelle, be present in plants)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(cell wall, be present in plant cells)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(cell wall, be present in plant cells)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(organelle, be present in plants)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(cell wall, help plant live)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(cell wall, help plant live)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(organelle, be present in plants)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(organelle, be present in plants)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(organelle, be present in plants)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(organelle, be present in animals)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(organelle, be present in plants)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(organelle, be found in plant)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(organelle, be present in plants)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(organelle, be present in animals)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(organelle, be present in plants)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(organelle, be found in plant)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(organelle, be present in plants)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(organelle, be present in animals)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(organelle, be present in plants)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(organelle, be found in plant)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(organelle, be present in plants)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(organelle, be present in animals)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(organelle, be present in plants)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(organelle, be found in plant)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(organelle, be present in plants)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(organelle, be present in plants)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(organelle, be present in plants)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(organelle, be present in plants)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(organelle, be present in plants)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(organelle, be present in plants)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(cell wall, be present in plants)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(organelle, be present in plants)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(cell wall, serve in plant)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(organelle, be present in plants)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(cell wall, be needed in plants)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(organelle, be present in plants)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(cell wall, be present in plant cells)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(organelle, be present in plants)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(cell wall, be essential for plants)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(organelle, be present in plants)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(cell wall, be present in plant cell)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(organelle, be present in plants)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(cell wall, help plant live)