oscilloscope: have high impedance

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.66
, instrument
Weight: 0.63
, product
Weight: 0.61
, equipment
Weight: 0.60
, electronic device
Weight: 0.59
Siblings microcontroller
Weight: 0.36
, thermistor
Weight: 0.35
, modem
Weight: 0.35
, microprocessor
Weight: 0.35
, computer keyboard
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
have high impedance 1.00
have impedance 0.99
is ohmic 0.83
were placed on high voltage side 0.80
is non ohmic 0.79
use amplifier 0.78
were placed on voltage side 0.77
be run by electrical energy represented as resistors in circuit 0.77
be run by electrical energy represented as resistors 0.77
be run by energy represented as resistors in circuit 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(instrument, were placed on high voltage side)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(oscilloscope, have high impedance)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(device, use amplifier)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(oscilloscope, have high impedance)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(electronic device, use amplifier)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(oscilloscope, have high impedance)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(device, be run by electrical energy represented as resistors in circuit)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(oscilloscope, have high impedance)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(device, be run by electrical energy represented as resistors)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(oscilloscope, have high impedance)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(device, be run by energy represented as resistors in circuit)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(oscilloscope, have high impedance)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(oscilloscope, have high impedance)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(device, be run by energy represented as resistors in circuit)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(oscilloscope, have high impedance)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(device, be run by electrical energy represented as resistors)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(oscilloscope, have high impedance)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(device, be run by electrical energy represented as resistors in circuit)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(oscilloscope, have high impedance)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(electronic device, use amplifier)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(oscilloscope, have high impedance)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(instrument, were placed on high voltage side)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(oscilloscope, have high impedance)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(device, use amplifier)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(oscilloscope, have high impedance)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(instrument, were placed on high voltage side)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(oscilloscope, have high impedance)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(device, be run by energy represented as resistors in circuit)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(oscilloscope, have high impedance)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(device, be run by electrical energy represented as resistors in circuit)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(oscilloscope, have high impedance)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(device, be run by electrical energy represented as resistors)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(oscilloscope, have high impedance)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(device, use amplifier)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(oscilloscope, have high impedance)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(electronic device, use amplifier)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(oscilloscope, have high impedance)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(thermistor, is non ohmic)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(oscilloscope, have high impedance)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(thermistor, is ohmic)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(instrument, were placed on high voltage side)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(oscilloscope, have high impedance)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(oscilloscope, have high impedance)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(device, use amplifier)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(oscilloscope, have high impedance)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(oscilloscope, have high impedance)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(electronic device, use amplifier)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(oscilloscope, have high impedance)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(oscilloscope, have high impedance)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(device, be run by electrical energy represented as resistors in circuit)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(oscilloscope, have high impedance)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(oscilloscope, have high impedance)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(device, be run by electrical energy represented as resistors)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(oscilloscope, have high impedance)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(oscilloscope, have high impedance)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(device, be run by energy represented as resistors in circuit)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(oscilloscope, have high impedance)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(oscilloscope, have high impedance)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(oscilloscope, have high impedance)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(thermistor, is ohmic)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(thermistor, is ohmic)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(oscilloscope, have high impedance)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(thermistor, is non ohmic)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(thermistor, is non ohmic)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(oscilloscope, have high impedance)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(oscilloscope, have high impedance)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(oscilloscope, have high impedance)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(oscilloscope, have impedance)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(oscilloscope, have high impedance)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(oscilloscope, have impedance)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(oscilloscope, have high impedance)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(oscilloscope, have impedance)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(oscilloscope, have high impedance)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(oscilloscope, have impedance)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(oscilloscope, have high impedance)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(oscilloscope, have high impedance)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(oscilloscope, have high impedance)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(oscilloscope, have high impedance)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(oscilloscope, have high impedance)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(oscilloscope, have high impedance)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(electronic device, use amplifier)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(oscilloscope, have high impedance)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(device, be run by electrical energy represented as resistors)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(oscilloscope, have high impedance)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(device, be run by electrical energy represented as resistors in circuit)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(oscilloscope, have high impedance)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(device, be run by energy represented as resistors in circuit)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(oscilloscope, have high impedance)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(instrument, were placed on high voltage side)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(oscilloscope, have high impedance)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(device, use amplifier)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(oscilloscope, have high impedance)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(thermistor, is ohmic)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(oscilloscope, have high impedance)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(thermistor, is non ohmic)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(oscilloscope, have high impedance)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(electronic device, use amplifier)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(oscilloscope, have high impedance)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(device, be run by electrical energy represented as resistors)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(oscilloscope, have high impedance)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(device, be run by electrical energy represented as resistors in circuit)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(oscilloscope, have high impedance)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(device, be run by energy represented as resistors in circuit)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(oscilloscope, have high impedance)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(instrument, were placed on high voltage side)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(oscilloscope, have high impedance)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(device, use amplifier)