osteoporosis: affect predominantly female population

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents symptom
Weight: 0.64
, complication
Weight: 0.63
, disease
Weight: 0.63
, illness
Weight: 0.61
, menopause
Weight: 0.59
Siblings rheumatoid arthritis
Weight: 0.72
, lyme disease
Weight: 0.36
, atherosclerosis
Weight: 0.36
, arthritis
Weight: 0.36
, hypertension
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect predominantly female population 1.00
affect predominantly population 0.97
affect female population 0.94
affect population 0.89
occur predominantly in poorer countries 0.83
occur predominantly in developing countries 0.82
occur predominantly in poorer developing countries 0.82
persist in population 0.81
persist in human population 0.80
occur more in females 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(disease, occur predominantly in poorer developing countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(osteoporosis, affect predominantly female population)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(osteoporosis, affect predominantly female population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(disease, occur predominantly in poorer developing countries)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(osteoporosis, affect predominantly female population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(disease, occur predominantly in poorer developing countries)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(disease, occur predominantly in poorer developing countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(osteoporosis, affect predominantly female population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(osteoporosis, affect predominantly female population)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(osteoporosis, affect predominantly female population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(osteoporosis, affect predominantly female population)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(osteoporosis, affect predominantly female population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(osteoporosis, affect predominantly population)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(osteoporosis, affect predominantly female population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(osteoporosis, affect predominantly population)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(osteoporosis, affect predominantly female population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(osteoporosis, affect predominantly population)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(osteoporosis, affect predominantly female population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(osteoporosis, affect population)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(osteoporosis, affect predominantly female population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(osteoporosis, affect female population)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(osteoporosis, affect predominantly female population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(osteoporosis, affect population)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(osteoporosis, affect predominantly female population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(osteoporosis, affect population)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(osteoporosis, affect predominantly female population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(osteoporosis, affect female population)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(osteoporosis, affect predominantly female population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(osteoporosis, affect female population)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(osteoporosis, affect predominantly female population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(osteoporosis, affect female population)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(osteoporosis, affect predominantly female population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(osteoporosis, occur more in females)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(osteoporosis, affect predominantly female population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(osteoporosis, affect predominantly population)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(osteoporosis, affect predominantly female population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(osteoporosis, occur more in females)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(osteoporosis, affect predominantly female population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(osteoporosis, occur more in females)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(osteoporosis, affect predominantly female population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(osteoporosis, affect population)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(osteoporosis, affect predominantly female population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(osteoporosis, occur more in females)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(osteoporosis, affect predominantly female population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(osteoporosis, affect predominantly female population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(osteoporosis, affect predominantly female population)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(osteoporosis, affect predominantly female population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(osteoporosis, affect predominantly female population)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(osteoporosis, affect predominantly female population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(disease, occur predominantly in poorer developing countries)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(osteoporosis, affect predominantly female population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(disease, occur predominantly in poorer developing countries)