osteoporosis: be more common in females

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents symptom
Weight: 0.64
, complication
Weight: 0.63
, disease
Weight: 0.63
, illness
Weight: 0.61
, menopause
Weight: 0.59
Siblings rheumatoid arthritis
Weight: 0.72
, lyme disease
Weight: 0.36
, atherosclerosis
Weight: 0.36
, arthritis
Weight: 0.36
, hypertension
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more common in females 1.00
be more common than males 0.96
occur more in females 0.90
is more common now 0.87
become more common 0.85
were more common in past 0.84
is common 0.83
were more common in cities 0.83
is common now 0.83
be more common in winter 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(illness, be more common in winter)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(osteoporosis, be more common in females)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(illness, become more common)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(osteoporosis, be more common in females)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(illness, is common)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(osteoporosis, be more common in females)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(osteoporosis, be more common in females)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(illness, is common)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(osteoporosis, be more common in females)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(illness, become more common)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(osteoporosis, be more common in females)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(illness, be more common in winter)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(osteoporosis, be more common in females)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(illness, be more common in winter)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(osteoporosis, be more common in females)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(illness, become more common)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(osteoporosis, be more common in females)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(illness, is common)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(osteoporosis, be more common in females)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(arthritis, be more common in females)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(osteoporosis, be more common in females)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(rheumatoid arthritis, be more common in females)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(osteoporosis, be more common in females)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(lyme disease, become more common)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(osteoporosis, be more common in females)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(arthritis, is common)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(illness, be more common in winter)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(osteoporosis, be more common in females)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(osteoporosis, be more common in females)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(illness, become more common)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(osteoporosis, be more common in females)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(osteoporosis, be more common in females)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(illness, is common)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(osteoporosis, be more common in females)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(osteoporosis, be more common in females)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(osteoporosis, be more common in females)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(arthritis, be more common in females)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(arthritis, be more common in females)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(osteoporosis, be more common in females)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(rheumatoid arthritis, be more common in females)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(rheumatoid arthritis, be more common in females)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(osteoporosis, be more common in females)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(lyme disease, become more common)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(lyme disease, become more common)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(osteoporosis, be more common in females)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(arthritis, is common)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(arthritis, is common)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(osteoporosis, be more common in females)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(osteoporosis, be more common in females)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(osteoporosis, be more common in females)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(osteoporosis, be more common than males)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(osteoporosis, be more common in females)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(osteoporosis, occur more in females)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(osteoporosis, be more common in females)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(osteoporosis, be more common than males)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(osteoporosis, be more common in females)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(osteoporosis, occur more in females)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(osteoporosis, be more common in females)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(osteoporosis, be more common than males)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(osteoporosis, be more common in females)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(osteoporosis, occur more in females)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(osteoporosis, be more common in females)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(osteoporosis, be more common than males)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(osteoporosis, be more common in females)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(osteoporosis, occur more in females)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(osteoporosis, be more common in females)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(osteoporosis, be more common in females)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(osteoporosis, be more common in females)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(osteoporosis, be more common in females)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(osteoporosis, be more common in females)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(osteoporosis, be more common in females)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(illness, is common)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(osteoporosis, be more common in females)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(illness, become more common)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(osteoporosis, be more common in females)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(illness, be more common in winter)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(osteoporosis, be more common in females)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(arthritis, be more common in females)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(osteoporosis, be more common in females)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(rheumatoid arthritis, be more common in females)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(osteoporosis, be more common in females)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(arthritis, is common)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(osteoporosis, be more common in females)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(lyme disease, become more common)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(osteoporosis, be more common in females)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(illness, is common)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(osteoporosis, be more common in females)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(illness, become more common)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(osteoporosis, be more common in females)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(illness, be more common in winter)