otter: be in danger

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.75
, mammal
Weight: 0.66
, animal
Weight: 0.66
, predator
Weight: 0.64
Siblings sea otter
Weight: 0.40
, dolphin
Weight: 0.39
, whale shark
Weight: 0.39
, lizard
Weight: 0.39
, hammerhead shark
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in danger 1.00
be in danger of extinction 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(otter, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(sea otter, be in danger)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(otter, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(dolphin, be in danger)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(otter, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(sea otter, be in danger of extinction)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(otter, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(dolphin, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(dolphin, be in danger)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(otter, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(sea otter, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(sea otter, be in danger)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(otter, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(sea otter, be in danger of extinction)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(sea otter, be in danger of extinction)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(otter, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(otter, be in danger)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(otter, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(otter, be in danger of extinction)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(otter, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(otter, be in danger of extinction)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(otter, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(otter, be in danger of extinction)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(otter, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(otter, be in danger of extinction)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(otter, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(otter, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(otter, be in danger)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(otter, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(otter, be in danger)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(otter, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(sea otter, be in danger)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(otter, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(dolphin, be in danger)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(otter, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(sea otter, be in danger of extinction)