outfitter: is popular

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents business
Weight: 0.50
, person
Weight: 0.49
, sportsman
Weight: 0.45
, information
Weight: 0.43
, store
Weight: 0.42
Siblings clothing store
Weight: 0.31
, barber shop
Weight: 0.31
, fisherman
Weight: 0.30
, department store
Weight: 0.30
, salesperson
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
is popular 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(outfitter, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(department store, is popular)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(outfitter, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(department store, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(department store, is popular)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(outfitter, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(outfitter, is popular)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(outfitter, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(outfitter, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(outfitter, is popular)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(outfitter, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(outfitter, is popular)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(outfitter, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(department store, is popular)