oven: have glass doors

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents household appliance
Weight: 0.60
, device
Weight: 0.59
, item
Weight: 0.56
, cooking utensil
Weight: 0.56
Siblings microwave oven
Weight: 0.73
, refrigerator
Weight: 0.36
, frying pan
Weight: 0.36
, fridge
Weight: 0.35
, stove
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
have glass doors 1.00
have glass 0.89
have double glass 0.82
have magnetic doors 0.82
have walls 0.78
be hot on door seal 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(oven, have glass doors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(fridge, have magnetic doors)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(oven, have glass doors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(refrigerator, have magnetic doors)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(oven, have glass doors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(refrigerator, be hot on door seal)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(oven, have glass doors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(fridge, have magnetic doors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(fridge, have magnetic doors)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(oven, have glass doors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(refrigerator, be hot on door seal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(refrigerator, be hot on door seal)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(oven, have glass doors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(refrigerator, have magnetic doors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(refrigerator, have magnetic doors)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(oven, have glass doors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(oven, have glass doors)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(oven, have glass doors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(oven, have glass)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(oven, have glass doors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(oven, have glass)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(oven, have glass doors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(oven, have glass)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(oven, have glass doors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(oven, have double glass)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(oven, have glass doors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(oven, have double glass)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(oven, have glass doors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(oven, have double glass)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(oven, have glass doors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(oven, have glass)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(oven, have glass doors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(oven, have double glass)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(oven, have glass doors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(oven, have glass doors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(oven, have glass doors)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(oven, have glass doors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(oven, have glass doors)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(oven, have glass doors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(fridge, have magnetic doors)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(oven, have glass doors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(refrigerator, have magnetic doors)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(oven, have glass doors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(refrigerator, be hot on door seal)