overall: be better south park

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.62
, performance
Weight: 0.56
, factor
Weight: 0.56
, game
Weight: 0.53
, problem
Weight: 0.52
Siblings third
Weight: 0.32
, second
Weight: 0.32
, lead
Weight: 0.32
, consistency
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better south park 1.00
be south park 0.96
be better park 0.94
be park 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(overall, be better south park)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(overall, be better south park)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(overall, be better south park)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(overall, be park)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(overall, be better south park)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(overall, be south park)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(overall, be better south park)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(overall, be south park)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(overall, be better south park)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(overall, be park)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(overall, be better south park)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(overall, be better park)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(overall, be better south park)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(overall, be park)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(overall, be better south park)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(overall, be better park)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(overall, be better south park)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(overall, be park)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(overall, be better south park)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(overall, be south park)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(overall, be better south park)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(overall, be better park)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(overall, be better south park)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(overall, be south park)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(overall, be better south park)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(overall, be better park)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(overall, be better south park)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(overall, be better south park)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(overall, be better south park)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(overall, be better south park)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(overall, be better south park)