overpopulation: affect land

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents issue
Weight: 0.66
, crisis
Weight: 0.65
, problem
Weight: 0.65
, topic
Weight: 0.65
, factor
Weight: 0.62
Siblings thyroid problem
Weight: 0.35
, inequality
Weight: 0.34
, mental health problem
Weight: 0.34
, desertification
Weight: 0.33
, illiteracy
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect land 1.00
affect life 0.78
affect world 0.77
affect change 0.77
affect life on earth 0.76
affect world building 0.76
affect farmers 0.76
affect stop 0.76
affect animals 0.76
affect environment 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, affect land)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, affect world building)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, affect land)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(desertification, affect farmers)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, affect land)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(desertification, affect animals)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, affect land)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(desertification, affect environment)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, affect land)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(inequality, affect environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(overpopulation, affect land)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(inequality, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(inequality, affect environment)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(overpopulation, affect land)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(desertification, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(desertification, affect environment)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(overpopulation, affect land)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(illiteracy, affect world building)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, affect world building)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(overpopulation, affect land)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(desertification, affect animals)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(desertification, affect animals)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(overpopulation, affect land)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(desertification, affect farmers)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(desertification, affect farmers)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(overpopulation, affect land)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(overpopulation, affect land)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(overpopulation, affect land)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(overpopulation, affect environment)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(overpopulation, affect land)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(overpopulation, affect life on earth)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(overpopulation, affect land)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(overpopulation, affect life)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(overpopulation, affect land)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, affect life on earth)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(overpopulation, affect land)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, affect life)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(overpopulation, affect land)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, affect life)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(overpopulation, affect land)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, affect world)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(overpopulation, affect land)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, affect life on earth)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(overpopulation, affect land)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(overpopulation, affect life)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(overpopulation, affect land)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(overpopulation, affect life on earth)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(overpopulation, affect land)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, affect environment)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(overpopulation, affect land)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, affect environment)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(overpopulation, affect land)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(overpopulation, affect world)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(overpopulation, affect land)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, affect world)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(overpopulation, affect land)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(overpopulation, affect environment)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(overpopulation, affect land)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(overpopulation, affect world)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(overpopulation, affect land)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(overpopulation, affect land)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, affect land)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(overpopulation, affect land)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(overpopulation, affect land)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, affect land)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(inequality, affect environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, affect land)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(desertification, affect environment)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, affect land)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(desertification, affect animals)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, affect land)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(illiteracy, affect world building)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, affect land)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(desertification, affect farmers)