overpopulation: be bad for wildlife

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents issue
Weight: 0.66
, crisis
Weight: 0.65
, problem
Weight: 0.65
, topic
Weight: 0.65
, factor
Weight: 0.62
Siblings thyroid problem
Weight: 0.35
, inequality
Weight: 0.34
, mental health problem
Weight: 0.34
, desertification
Weight: 0.33
, illiteracy
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for wildlife 1.00
be for aquatic ecosystems 0.78
affect animals 0.78
be for ecosystems 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be bad for wildlife)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(desertification, affect animals)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(overpopulation, be bad for wildlife)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(desertification, affect animals)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(desertification, affect animals)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(overpopulation, be bad for wildlife)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(overpopulation, be bad for wildlife)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(overpopulation, be bad for wildlife)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(overpopulation, be bad for wildlife)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be bad for wildlife)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(overpopulation, be bad for wildlife)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(overpopulation, be bad for wildlife)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be bad for wildlife)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(desertification, affect animals)