overpopulation: be bad for world

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents issue
Weight: 0.66
, crisis
Weight: 0.65
, problem
Weight: 0.65
, topic
Weight: 0.65
, factor
Weight: 0.62
Siblings thyroid problem
Weight: 0.35
, inequality
Weight: 0.34
, mental health problem
Weight: 0.34
, desertification
Weight: 0.33
, illiteracy
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for world 1.00
be in world 0.89
is bad thing 0.83
be bad for business 0.83
affect world 0.82
be problem to world 0.82
has quality bad 0.82
be bad for economy 0.80
is good thing 0.79
exist in world 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(problem, be in world)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(overpopulation, be bad for world)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(overpopulation, be bad for world)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(problem, be in world)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be bad for world)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(problem, be in world)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be bad for world)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be in world)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be bad for world)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(desertification, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be bad for world)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be bad for world)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for business)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be bad for world)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for economy)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be bad for world)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be bad for world)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is good thing)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be bad for world)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(inequality, exist in world)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(problem, be in world)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(overpopulation, be bad for world)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, be bad for world)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(overpopulation, be bad for world)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(inequality, be in world)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(inequality, be in world)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(overpopulation, be bad for world)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(inequality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(inequality, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(overpopulation, be bad for world)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(inequality, exist in world)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(inequality, exist in world)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(overpopulation, be bad for world)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(inequality, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(inequality, is good thing)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(overpopulation, be bad for world)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(illiteracy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(overpopulation, be bad for world)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(desertification, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(desertification, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(overpopulation, be bad for world)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(inequality, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(inequality, be bad for economy)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(overpopulation, be bad for world)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(inequality, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(inequality, be bad for business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(overpopulation, be bad for world)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(overpopulation, be bad for world)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(overpopulation, be bad for world)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, be in world)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(overpopulation, be bad for world)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(overpopulation, be in world)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(overpopulation, be bad for world)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is bad thing)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(overpopulation, be bad for world)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(overpopulation, be in world)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(overpopulation, be bad for world)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is good thing)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(overpopulation, be bad for world)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(overpopulation, is good thing)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(overpopulation, be bad for world)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be in world)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(overpopulation, be bad for world)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is good thing)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(overpopulation, be bad for world)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is good thing)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(overpopulation, be bad for world)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is bad thing)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(overpopulation, be bad for world)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem to world)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(overpopulation, be bad for world)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(overpopulation, affect world)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(overpopulation, be bad for world)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(overpopulation, be problem to world)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(overpopulation, be bad for world)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(overpopulation, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(overpopulation, be bad for world)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(overpopulation, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(overpopulation, be bad for world)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(overpopulation, be bad for world)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(overpopulation, be problem to world)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(overpopulation, be bad for world)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(overpopulation, be bad for world)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(overpopulation, is bad thing)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(overpopulation, be bad for world)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, be problem to world)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(overpopulation, be bad for world)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, affect world)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(overpopulation, be bad for world)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(overpopulation, affect world)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(overpopulation, be bad for world)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, affect world)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(overpopulation, be bad for world)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is bad thing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(overpopulation, be bad for world)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(overpopulation, be bad for world)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be bad for world)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(overpopulation, be bad for world)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(overpopulation, be bad for world)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be bad for world)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(problem, be in world)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be bad for world)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(inequality, be in world)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be bad for world)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(inequality, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be bad for world)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(inequality, is good thing)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be bad for world)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(inequality, exist in world)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be bad for world)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(illiteracy, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be bad for world)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(desertification, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be bad for world)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(inequality, be bad for business)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be bad for world)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(inequality, be bad for economy)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(overpopulation, be bad for world)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(problem, be in world)