overpopulation: be problem in developing countries

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents issue
Weight: 0.66
, crisis
Weight: 0.65
, problem
Weight: 0.65
, topic
Weight: 0.65
, factor
Weight: 0.62
Siblings thyroid problem
Weight: 0.35
, inequality
Weight: 0.34
, mental health problem
Weight: 0.34
, desertification
Weight: 0.33
, illiteracy
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be problem in developing countries 1.00
be problem in countries 0.94
be common in developing countries 0.92
be with other countries 0.85
is global problem 0.85
happen more in underdeveloped countries 0.85
be problem to world 0.84
be common in countries 0.84
happen more in countries 0.82
exist between countries 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(problem, be common in developing countries)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(overpopulation, be problem in developing countries)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(overpopulation, be problem in developing countries)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(problem, be common in developing countries)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in developing countries)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(problem, be common in developing countries)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in developing countries)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(desertification, is global problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in developing countries)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(inequality, exist between countries)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(problem, be common in developing countries)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in developing countries)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, be problem in developing countries)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(overpopulation, be problem in developing countries)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(inequality, exist between countries)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(inequality, exist between countries)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(overpopulation, be problem in developing countries)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(desertification, is global problem)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(desertification, is global problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(overpopulation, be problem in developing countries)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(overpopulation, be problem in developing countries)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(overpopulation, be problem in developing countries)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(overpopulation, be problem in countries)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(overpopulation, be problem in developing countries)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, be problem in countries)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(overpopulation, be problem in developing countries)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, happen more in countries)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(overpopulation, be problem in developing countries)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(overpopulation, happen more in countries)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(overpopulation, be problem in developing countries)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(overpopulation, be problem in countries)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(overpopulation, be problem in developing countries)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(overpopulation, happen more in countries)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(overpopulation, be problem in developing countries)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, happen more in underdeveloped countries)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in developing countries)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is global problem)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(overpopulation, be problem in developing countries)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(overpopulation, happen more in underdeveloped countries)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(overpopulation, be problem in developing countries)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(overpopulation, happen more in underdeveloped countries)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(overpopulation, be problem in developing countries)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(overpopulation, is global problem)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in developing countries)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, happen more in countries)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in developing countries)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem to world)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in developing countries)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, happen more in underdeveloped countries)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(overpopulation, be problem in developing countries)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is global problem)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(overpopulation, be problem in developing countries)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(overpopulation, be problem to world)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(overpopulation, be problem in developing countries)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is global problem)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in developing countries)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in countries)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(overpopulation, be problem in developing countries)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, be problem to world)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(overpopulation, be problem in developing countries)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(overpopulation, be problem to world)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(overpopulation, be problem in developing countries)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(overpopulation, be problem in developing countries)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in developing countries)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(overpopulation, be problem in developing countries)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(overpopulation, be problem in developing countries)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in developing countries)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(problem, be common in developing countries)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in developing countries)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(desertification, is global problem)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in developing countries)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(inequality, exist between countries)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(overpopulation, be problem in developing countries)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(problem, be common in developing countries)