overpopulation: connect to climate change

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents issue
Weight: 0.66
, crisis
Weight: 0.65
, problem
Weight: 0.65
, topic
Weight: 0.65
, factor
Weight: 0.62
Siblings thyroid problem
Weight: 0.35
, inequality
Weight: 0.34
, mental health problem
Weight: 0.34
, desertification
Weight: 0.33
, illiteracy
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
connect to climate change 1.00
be with climate changes 0.84
affect change 0.76
create problems for environment 0.76
affect cultural change 0.76
affecting global climates 0.76
affect environment 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(factor, affect cultural change)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(overpopulation, connect to climate change)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(overpopulation, connect to climate change)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(factor, affect cultural change)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, connect to climate change)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(factor, affect cultural change)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, connect to climate change)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(desertification, create problems for environment)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, connect to climate change)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(desertification, affect environment)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, connect to climate change)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(inequality, affect environment)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(factor, affect cultural change)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(overpopulation, connect to climate change)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, connect to climate change)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(overpopulation, connect to climate change)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(inequality, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(inequality, affect environment)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(overpopulation, connect to climate change)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(desertification, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(desertification, affect environment)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(overpopulation, connect to climate change)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(desertification, create problems for environment)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(desertification, create problems for environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(overpopulation, connect to climate change)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(overpopulation, connect to climate change)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(overpopulation, connect to climate change)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(overpopulation, affect environment)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(overpopulation, connect to climate change)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, affect environment)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(overpopulation, connect to climate change)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(overpopulation, affect environment)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(overpopulation, connect to climate change)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, affect environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(overpopulation, connect to climate change)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(overpopulation, connect to climate change)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, connect to climate change)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(overpopulation, connect to climate change)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(overpopulation, connect to climate change)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, connect to climate change)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(factor, affect cultural change)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, connect to climate change)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(inequality, affect environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, connect to climate change)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(desertification, affect environment)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, connect to climate change)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(desertification, create problems for environment)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(overpopulation, connect to climate change)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(factor, affect cultural change)