overpopulation: contribute to pollution

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents issue
Weight: 0.66
, crisis
Weight: 0.65
, problem
Weight: 0.65
, topic
Weight: 0.65
, factor
Weight: 0.62
Siblings thyroid problem
Weight: 0.35
, inequality
Weight: 0.34
, mental health problem
Weight: 0.34
, desertification
Weight: 0.33
, illiteracy
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
contribute to pollution 1.00
affect air pollution 0.91
contribute to crime 0.77
contribute to warming 0.77
is environmental problem 0.77
is environmental 0.76
contribute to global warming 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(inequality, contribute to crime)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is environmental problem)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(desertification, is environmental)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(overpopulation, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(desertification, is environmental)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(desertification, is environmental)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(overpopulation, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(inequality, is environmental problem)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(inequality, is environmental problem)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(overpopulation, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(inequality, contribute to crime)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(inequality, contribute to crime)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(overpopulation, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(overpopulation, contribute to pollution)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(overpopulation, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, affect air pollution)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(overpopulation, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(overpopulation, affect air pollution)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(overpopulation, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, contribute to global warming)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(overpopulation, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, contribute to warming)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(overpopulation, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is environmental problem)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(overpopulation, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is environmental problem)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(overpopulation, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is environmental)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(overpopulation, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, affect air pollution)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(overpopulation, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(overpopulation, contribute to global warming)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(overpopulation, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(overpopulation, affect air pollution)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(overpopulation, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is environmental)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(overpopulation, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, contribute to global warming)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(overpopulation, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(overpopulation, contribute to warming)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(overpopulation, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is environmental problem)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(overpopulation, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(overpopulation, contribute to warming)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(overpopulation, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, contribute to warming)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(overpopulation, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(overpopulation, is environmental problem)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(overpopulation, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is environmental)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(overpopulation, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(overpopulation, is environmental)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(overpopulation, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(overpopulation, contribute to global warming)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(overpopulation, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(overpopulation, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, contribute to pollution)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(overpopulation, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(overpopulation, contribute to pollution)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(desertification, is environmental)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(inequality, is environmental problem)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(inequality, contribute to crime)