overpopulation: has quality bad

Related concepts

Parents	issue Weight: 0.66 , crisis Weight: 0.65 , problem Weight: 0.65 , topic Weight: 0.65 , factor Weight: 0.62
Siblings	thyroid problem Weight: 0.35 , inequality Weight: 0.34 , mental health problem Weight: 0.34 , desertification Weight: 0.33 , illiteracy Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality bad	1.00
has quality good	0.96
be bad for world	0.82
be in quality of life	0.81
be bad for business	0.80
is bad thing	0.79
be bad for growth	0.76
is necessarily bad thing	0.76
is good thing	0.75
has quality definition	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Remarkable(inequality, has quality good)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Remarkable(desertification, has quality bad)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, has quality bad)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Remarkable(inequality, be in quality of life)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(inequality, has quality bad)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for business)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for growth)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(inequality, is good thing)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Remarkable(inequality, is necessarily bad thing)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.43

Plausible(overpopulation, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

Remarkable(inequality, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Plausible(inequality, has quality good)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.43

Plausible(overpopulation, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(inequality, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Plausible(inequality, has quality bad)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.43

Plausible(overpopulation, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

Remarkable(illiteracy, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Plausible(illiteracy, has quality bad)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.43

Plausible(overpopulation, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

Remarkable(desertification, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Plausible(desertification, has quality bad)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.43

Plausible(overpopulation, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

Remarkable(inequality, be in quality of life) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Plausible(inequality, be in quality of life)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.43

Plausible(overpopulation, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

Remarkable(inequality, is necessarily bad thing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Plausible(inequality, is necessarily bad thing)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.43

Plausible(overpopulation, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

Remarkable(inequality, is good thing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Plausible(inequality, is good thing)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.43

Plausible(overpopulation, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

Remarkable(inequality, be bad for business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(inequality, be bad for business)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.43

Plausible(overpopulation, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

Remarkable(inequality, be bad for growth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Plausible(inequality, be bad for growth)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.43

Plausible(overpopulation, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Salient(overpopulation, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.43

Plausible(overpopulation, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Plausible(overpopulation, has quality good)

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.40

Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality good)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.39

Salient(overpopulation, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Salient(overpopulation, has quality good)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.55

Typical(overpopulation, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Typical(overpopulation, has quality good)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.40

Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be bad for world)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.43

Plausible(overpopulation, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Plausible(overpopulation, be bad for world)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.39

Salient(overpopulation, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Salient(overpopulation, be bad for world)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.55

Typical(overpopulation, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Typical(overpopulation, is bad thing)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.43

Plausible(overpopulation, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is good thing)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.39

Salient(overpopulation, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Salient(overpopulation, is good thing)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.55

Typical(overpopulation, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Typical(overpopulation, is good thing)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.55

Typical(overpopulation, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Typical(overpopulation, be bad for world)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.40

Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is good thing)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.43

Plausible(overpopulation, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is bad thing)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.39

Salient(overpopulation, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Salient(overpopulation, is bad thing)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.40

Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is bad thing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.39

Salient(overpopulation, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Typical(overpopulation, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.43

Plausible(overpopulation, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Typical(overpopulation, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Typical(inequality, has quality good)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Typical(inequality, has quality bad)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Typical(illiteracy, has quality bad)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Typical(desertification, has quality bad)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Typical(inequality, be in quality of life)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Typical(inequality, is necessarily bad thing)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Typical(inequality, is good thing)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(inequality, be bad for growth)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(inequality, be bad for business)