overpopulation: has quality good

Related concepts

Parents	issue Weight: 0.66 , crisis Weight: 0.65 , problem Weight: 0.65 , topic Weight: 0.65 , factor Weight: 0.62
Siblings	thyroid problem Weight: 0.35 , inequality Weight: 0.34 , mental health problem Weight: 0.34 , desertification Weight: 0.33 , illiteracy Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality good	1.00
has quality bad	0.96
be in quality of life	0.83
is good thing	0.78
has quality definition	0.76
be bad for world	0.76
be bad for business	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Remarkable(inequality, has quality good)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Remarkable(desertification, has quality bad)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, has quality bad)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(inequality, has quality bad)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Remarkable(inequality, be in quality of life)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(inequality, is good thing)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for business)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.14

Plausible(overpopulation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

Remarkable(inequality, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Plausible(inequality, has quality good)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.14

Plausible(overpopulation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(inequality, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Plausible(inequality, has quality bad)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.14

Plausible(overpopulation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

Remarkable(inequality, be in quality of life) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Plausible(inequality, be in quality of life)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.14

Plausible(overpopulation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

Remarkable(illiteracy, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Plausible(illiteracy, has quality bad)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.14

Plausible(overpopulation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

Remarkable(desertification, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Plausible(desertification, has quality bad)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.14

Plausible(overpopulation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

Remarkable(inequality, is good thing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Plausible(inequality, is good thing)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.14

Plausible(overpopulation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

Remarkable(inequality, be bad for business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(inequality, be bad for business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.14

Plausible(overpopulation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Salient(overpopulation, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.14

Plausible(overpopulation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is good thing)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.14

Salient(overpopulation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Salient(overpopulation, is good thing)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.42

Typical(overpopulation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Typical(overpopulation, is good thing)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.42

Typical(overpopulation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Typical(overpopulation, has quality bad)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.13

Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be bad for world)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.14

Salient(overpopulation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Salient(overpopulation, be bad for world)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.14

Salient(overpopulation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Salient(overpopulation, has quality bad)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.14

Plausible(overpopulation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Plausible(overpopulation, be bad for world)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.13

Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality bad)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.13

Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is good thing)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.14

Plausible(overpopulation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Plausible(overpopulation, has quality bad)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.42

Typical(overpopulation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Typical(overpopulation, be bad for world)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.14

Salient(overpopulation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Typical(overpopulation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.14

Plausible(overpopulation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Typical(overpopulation, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Typical(inequality, has quality good)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Typical(inequality, has quality bad)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Typical(illiteracy, has quality bad)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Typical(desertification, has quality bad)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Typical(inequality, be in quality of life)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Typical(inequality, is good thing)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(inequality, be bad for business)