overpopulation: is bad thing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents issue
Weight: 0.66
, crisis
Weight: 0.65
, problem
Weight: 0.65
, topic
Weight: 0.65
, factor
Weight: 0.62
Siblings thyroid problem
Weight: 0.35
, inequality
Weight: 0.34
, mental health problem
Weight: 0.34
, desertification
Weight: 0.33
, illiteracy
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is bad thing 1.00
is good thing 0.97
is thing 0.94
is necessarily bad thing 0.90
is same thing 0.89
is necessarily thing 0.85
be bad for world 0.83
is big problem 0.80
be bad for business 0.80
has quality bad 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(factor, is same thing)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is bad thing)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(overpopulation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(factor, is same thing)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(factor, is same thing)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(desertification, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is good thing)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for business)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is necessarily bad thing)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(factor, is same thing)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(overpopulation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is bad thing)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(overpopulation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(inequality, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(inequality, is good thing)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(overpopulation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(inequality, is necessarily bad thing)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(inequality, is necessarily bad thing)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(overpopulation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(inequality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(inequality, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(overpopulation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(illiteracy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(overpopulation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(desertification, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(desertification, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(overpopulation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(inequality, be bad for business)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(inequality, be bad for business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(overpopulation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(overpopulation, is bad thing)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(overpopulation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is good thing)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(overpopulation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is thing)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(overpopulation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is good thing)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(overpopulation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(overpopulation, is good thing)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(overpopulation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is thing)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(overpopulation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be bad for world)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(overpopulation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is good thing)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(overpopulation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is thing)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(overpopulation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(overpopulation, be bad for world)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(overpopulation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is big problem)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(overpopulation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(overpopulation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, be bad for world)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(overpopulation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(overpopulation, is thing)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(overpopulation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(overpopulation, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(overpopulation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(overpopulation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(overpopulation, is big problem)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(overpopulation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(overpopulation, be bad for world)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(overpopulation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is big problem)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(overpopulation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(overpopulation, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(overpopulation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is big problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(overpopulation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is bad thing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(overpopulation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is bad thing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(factor, is same thing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(inequality, is good thing)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(inequality, is necessarily bad thing)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(inequality, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(illiteracy, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(desertification, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(inequality, be bad for business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(overpopulation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(factor, is same thing)