overpopulation: is big

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents issue
Weight: 0.66
, crisis
Weight: 0.65
, problem
Weight: 0.65
, topic
Weight: 0.65
, factor
Weight: 0.62
Siblings thyroid problem
Weight: 0.35
, inequality
Weight: 0.34
, mental health problem
Weight: 0.34
, desertification
Weight: 0.33
, illiteracy
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is big 1.00
is big problem 0.86
is major 0.82
is major problem 0.78
be important in real life 0.75
is good thing 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is big)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(desertification, is major)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is big)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be important in real life)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is big)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is good thing)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(overpopulation, is big)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(inequality, be important in real life)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(inequality, be important in real life)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(overpopulation, is big)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(inequality, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(inequality, is good thing)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(overpopulation, is big)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(desertification, is major)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(desertification, is major)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(overpopulation, is big)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(overpopulation, is big)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(overpopulation, is big)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is good thing)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(overpopulation, is big)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is good thing)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(overpopulation, is big)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(overpopulation, is good thing)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(overpopulation, is big)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is big problem)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(overpopulation, is big)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is good thing)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(overpopulation, is big)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is big problem)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(overpopulation, is big)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is major)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(overpopulation, is big)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is major)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(overpopulation, is big)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is big problem)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(overpopulation, is big)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is major problem)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(overpopulation, is big)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(overpopulation, is big problem)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(overpopulation, is big)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is major problem)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(overpopulation, is big)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is major)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(overpopulation, is big)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is major problem)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(overpopulation, is big)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(overpopulation, is major)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(overpopulation, is big)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(overpopulation, is major problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(overpopulation, is big)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is big)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is big)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(overpopulation, is big)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is big)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is big)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(inequality, is good thing)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is big)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(inequality, be important in real life)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is big)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(desertification, is major)