overpopulation: is big problem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents issue
Weight: 0.66
, crisis
Weight: 0.65
, problem
Weight: 0.65
, topic
Weight: 0.65
, factor
Weight: 0.62
Siblings thyroid problem
Weight: 0.35
, inequality
Weight: 0.34
, mental health problem
Weight: 0.34
, desertification
Weight: 0.33
, illiteracy
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is big problem 1.00
is major problem 0.93
is problem brainly 0.93
is serious problem 0.89
has state problem 0.88
be problem to world 0.88
be cause problem 0.86
is big 0.86
is social problem 0.84
is minor problem 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(issue, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is big problem)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(overpopulation, is big problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(issue, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is big problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(issue, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is big problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(desertification, is problem brainly)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is big problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(desertification, is serious problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is big problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(desertification, has state problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is big problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, be cause problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is big problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, has state problem)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is big problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, is social problem)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is big problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has state problem)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is big problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is social problem)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(issue, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(overpopulation, is big problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is big problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(overpopulation, is big problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(desertification, is problem brainly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(desertification, is problem brainly)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(overpopulation, is big problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(inequality, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(inequality, has state problem)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(overpopulation, is big problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(inequality, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(inequality, is social problem)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(overpopulation, is big problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(illiteracy, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, is social problem)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(overpopulation, is big problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(desertification, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(desertification, has state problem)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(overpopulation, is big problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(illiteracy, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, has state problem)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(overpopulation, is big problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(desertification, is serious problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(desertification, is serious problem)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(overpopulation, is big problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(illiteracy, be cause problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, be cause problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(overpopulation, is big problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(overpopulation, is big problem)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(overpopulation, is big problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(overpopulation, has state problem)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(overpopulation, is big problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(overpopulation, is big)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(overpopulation, is big problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(overpopulation, be problem to world)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(overpopulation, is big problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is major problem)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(overpopulation, is big problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is big)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(overpopulation, is big problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is big)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(overpopulation, is big problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is big)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(overpopulation, is big problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(overpopulation, be problem to world)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(overpopulation, is big problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, be problem to world)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(overpopulation, is big problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, has state problem)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(overpopulation, is big problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(overpopulation, has state problem)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(overpopulation, is big problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem to world)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(overpopulation, is big problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is minor problem)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(overpopulation, is big problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has state problem)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(overpopulation, is big problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is major problem)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(overpopulation, is big problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is minor problem)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(overpopulation, is big problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is major problem)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(overpopulation, is big problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(overpopulation, is major problem)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(overpopulation, is big problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is minor problem)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(overpopulation, is big problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(overpopulation, is minor problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(overpopulation, is big problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is big problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is big problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(overpopulation, is big problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is big problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is big problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(issue, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is big problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(inequality, has state problem)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is big problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(inequality, is social problem)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is big problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(illiteracy, is social problem)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is big problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(desertification, is problem brainly)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is big problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(desertification, has state problem)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is big problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(illiteracy, has state problem)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is big problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(desertification, is serious problem)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is big problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(illiteracy, be cause problem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(overpopulation, is big problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(issue, has state problem)