overpopulation: is environmental problem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents issue
Weight: 0.66
, crisis
Weight: 0.65
, problem
Weight: 0.65
, topic
Weight: 0.65
, factor
Weight: 0.62
Siblings thyroid problem
Weight: 0.35
, inequality
Weight: 0.34
, mental health problem
Weight: 0.34
, desertification
Weight: 0.33
, illiteracy
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is environmental problem 1.00
is environmental 0.92
is environmental concern 0.91
is major environmental concern 0.89
is social problem 0.83
is economic problem 0.82
be cause social problem 0.82
is problem brainly 0.81
is global problem 0.81
has state problem 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(issue, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is environmental problem)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(overpopulation, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(issue, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(issue, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(desertification, is problem brainly)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(desertification, is global problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, be cause social problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(desertification, has state problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(desertification, is major environmental concern)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, has state problem)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is economic problem)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, is social problem)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is environmental problem)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(desertification, is environmental concern)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is social problem)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has state problem)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(desertification, is environmental)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(issue, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(overpopulation, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is environmental problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(overpopulation, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(inequality, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(inequality, is environmental problem)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(overpopulation, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(desertification, is environmental) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(desertification, is environmental)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(overpopulation, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(desertification, is environmental concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(desertification, is environmental concern)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(overpopulation, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(inequality, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(inequality, is social problem)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(overpopulation, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(illiteracy, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, is social problem)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(overpopulation, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(inequality, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(inequality, has state problem)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(overpopulation, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(inequality, is economic problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(inequality, is economic problem)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(overpopulation, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(desertification, is problem brainly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(desertification, is problem brainly)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(overpopulation, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(desertification, is global problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(desertification, is global problem)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(overpopulation, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(desertification, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(desertification, has state problem)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(overpopulation, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(illiteracy, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, has state problem)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(overpopulation, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(illiteracy, be cause social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, be cause social problem)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(overpopulation, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(desertification, is major environmental concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(desertification, is major environmental concern)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(overpopulation, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(overpopulation, is environmental problem)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(overpopulation, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is environmental)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(overpopulation, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic problem)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(overpopulation, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is environmental)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(overpopulation, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is global problem)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(overpopulation, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has state problem)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(overpopulation, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(overpopulation, is economic problem)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(overpopulation, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(overpopulation, is global problem)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(overpopulation, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is environmental)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(overpopulation, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(overpopulation, is environmental)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(overpopulation, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is economic problem)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(overpopulation, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(overpopulation, has state problem)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(overpopulation, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is global problem)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(overpopulation, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, has state problem)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(overpopulation, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is economic problem)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(overpopulation, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is global problem)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(overpopulation, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(overpopulation, has state problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(overpopulation, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is environmental problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(overpopulation, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is environmental problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(issue, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(inequality, is environmental problem)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(desertification, is environmental)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(inequality, is social problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(desertification, is environmental concern)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(inequality, has state problem)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(illiteracy, is social problem)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(inequality, is economic problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(desertification, is problem brainly)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(desertification, is global problem)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(desertification, has state problem)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(illiteracy, has state problem)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(illiteracy, be cause social problem)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(desertification, is major environmental concern)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(overpopulation, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(issue, has state problem)