overpopulation: is global issue

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents issue
Weight: 0.66
, crisis
Weight: 0.65
, problem
Weight: 0.65
, topic
Weight: 0.65
, factor
Weight: 0.62
Siblings thyroid problem
Weight: 0.35
, inequality
Weight: 0.34
, mental health problem
Weight: 0.34
, desertification
Weight: 0.33
, illiteracy
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is global issue 1.00
is global problem 0.91
is global 0.88
is issue 0.87
is global concern 0.86
is economic problem 0.80
be problem to world 0.79
be problem in countries 0.78
be problem in developing countries 0.78
affect global warming 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is global issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, is global issue)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is global issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is global issue)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is global issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(desertification, is global problem)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is global issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(desertification, is global)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is global issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, is global)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is global issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, is issue)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is global issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is issue)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is global issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(desertification, affect global warming)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is global issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is economic problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(overpopulation, is global issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(inequality, is global issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(inequality, is global issue)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(overpopulation, is global issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(inequality, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(inequality, is issue)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(overpopulation, is global issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(illiteracy, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, is issue)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(overpopulation, is global issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(illiteracy, is global issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, is global issue)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(overpopulation, is global issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(inequality, is economic problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(inequality, is economic problem)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(overpopulation, is global issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(desertification, is global problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(desertification, is global problem)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(overpopulation, is global issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(desertification, is global) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(desertification, is global)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(overpopulation, is global issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(illiteracy, is global) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, is global)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(overpopulation, is global issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(desertification, affect global warming) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(desertification, affect global warming)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(overpopulation, is global issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(overpopulation, is global issue)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(overpopulation, is global issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is issue)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(overpopulation, is global issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is global concern)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(overpopulation, is global issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is issue)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(overpopulation, is global issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(overpopulation, is global concern)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(overpopulation, is global issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, be problem in developing countries)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(overpopulation, is global issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(overpopulation, be problem in developing countries)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(overpopulation, is global issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in developing countries)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(overpopulation, is global issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is global concern)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(overpopulation, is global issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is global problem)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(overpopulation, is global issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(overpopulation, be problem in countries)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(overpopulation, is global issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(overpopulation, is global problem)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(overpopulation, is global issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is global concern)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(overpopulation, is global issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(overpopulation, is issue)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(overpopulation, is global issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is global)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(overpopulation, is global issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, be problem in countries)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(overpopulation, is global issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(overpopulation, be problem in developing countries)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(overpopulation, is global issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(overpopulation, is global)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(overpopulation, is global issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is global problem)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(overpopulation, is global issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(overpopulation, is economic problem)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(overpopulation, is global issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(overpopulation, be problem in countries)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(overpopulation, is global issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is global problem)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(overpopulation, is global issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is economic problem)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(overpopulation, is global issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is economic problem)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(overpopulation, is global issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem to world)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(overpopulation, is global issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic problem)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(overpopulation, is global issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(overpopulation, be problem to world)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(overpopulation, is global issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is global)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(overpopulation, is global issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is global)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(overpopulation, is global issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(overpopulation, be problem to world)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(overpopulation, is global issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, be problem to world)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(overpopulation, is global issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in countries)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(overpopulation, is global issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is issue)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(overpopulation, is global issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is global issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is global issue)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(overpopulation, is global issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is global issue)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is global issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(inequality, is global issue)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is global issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(illiteracy, is global issue)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is global issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(inequality, is issue)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is global issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(illiteracy, is issue)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is global issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(desertification, is global problem)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is global issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(desertification, is global)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is global issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(illiteracy, is global)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is global issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(inequality, is economic problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is global issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(desertification, affect global warming)