overpopulation: is good thing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents issue
Weight: 0.66
, crisis
Weight: 0.65
, problem
Weight: 0.65
, topic
Weight: 0.65
, factor
Weight: 0.62
Siblings thyroid problem
Weight: 0.35
, inequality
Weight: 0.34
, mental health problem
Weight: 0.34
, desertification
Weight: 0.33
, illiteracy
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is good thing 1.00
is bad thing 0.97
is thing 0.95
is same thing 0.91
is necessarily bad thing 0.89
is necessarily thing 0.86
is big problem 0.80
be bad for world 0.79
has quality good 0.78
be in sport important to us 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(factor, is same thing)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is good thing)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(issue, be in sport important to us)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is good thing)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(overpopulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(factor, is same thing)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(overpopulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(issue, be in sport important to us)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(factor, is same thing)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(issue, be in sport important to us)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is good thing)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is necessarily bad thing)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(factor, is same thing)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(overpopulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is good thing)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(issue, be in sport important to us)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(overpopulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is good thing)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(overpopulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(inequality, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(inequality, is good thing)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(overpopulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(inequality, is necessarily bad thing)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(inequality, is necessarily bad thing)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(overpopulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(inequality, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(inequality, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(overpopulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(overpopulation, is good thing)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(overpopulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is thing)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(overpopulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is bad thing)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(overpopulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is thing)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(overpopulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(overpopulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is bad thing)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(overpopulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(overpopulation, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(overpopulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(overpopulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be bad for world)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(overpopulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(overpopulation, be bad for world)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(overpopulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, be bad for world)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(overpopulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(overpopulation, is bad thing)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(overpopulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is big problem)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(overpopulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(overpopulation, is thing)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(overpopulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(overpopulation, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(overpopulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(overpopulation, be bad for world)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(overpopulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(overpopulation, is big problem)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(overpopulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is bad thing)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(overpopulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is big problem)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(overpopulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is big problem)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(overpopulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is thing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(overpopulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is good thing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(overpopulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is good thing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(factor, is same thing)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(issue, be in sport important to us)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(inequality, is good thing)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(inequality, is necessarily bad thing)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(inequality, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(overpopulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(factor, is same thing)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(overpopulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(issue, be in sport important to us)