overpopulation: is major problem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents issue
Weight: 0.66
, crisis
Weight: 0.65
, problem
Weight: 0.65
, topic
Weight: 0.65
, factor
Weight: 0.62
Siblings thyroid problem
Weight: 0.35
, inequality
Weight: 0.34
, mental health problem
Weight: 0.34
, desertification
Weight: 0.33
, illiteracy
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is major problem 1.00
is big problem 0.93
is problem brainly 0.89
is serious problem 0.89
is major 0.88
is major concern 0.87
be problem to world 0.87
has state problem 0.87
is minor problem 0.87
is global problem 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(issue, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is major problem)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(overpopulation, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(issue, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(issue, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(desertification, is problem brainly)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(desertification, is global problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(desertification, is serious problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(desertification, has state problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(desertification, is major)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, has state problem)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(desertification, is major concern)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has state problem)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(issue, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(overpopulation, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is major problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(overpopulation, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(inequality, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(inequality, has state problem)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(overpopulation, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(desertification, is problem brainly)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(desertification, is problem brainly)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(overpopulation, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(desertification, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(desertification, has state problem)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(overpopulation, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(illiteracy, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, has state problem)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(overpopulation, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(desertification, is serious problem)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(desertification, is serious problem)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(overpopulation, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(desertification, is global problem)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(desertification, is global problem)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(overpopulation, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(desertification, is major concern)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(desertification, is major concern)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(overpopulation, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(desertification, is major)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(desertification, is major)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(overpopulation, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(overpopulation, is major problem)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(overpopulation, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(overpopulation, is big problem)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(overpopulation, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is big problem)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(overpopulation, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(overpopulation, be problem to world)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(overpopulation, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is big problem)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(overpopulation, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(overpopulation, has state problem)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(overpopulation, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(overpopulation, is global problem)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(overpopulation, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(overpopulation, has state problem)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(overpopulation, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(overpopulation, be problem to world)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(overpopulation, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, be problem to world)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(overpopulation, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is global problem)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(overpopulation, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, has state problem)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(overpopulation, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is global problem)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(overpopulation, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is major)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(overpopulation, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is minor problem)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(overpopulation, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(overpopulation, is major)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(overpopulation, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is big problem)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(overpopulation, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(overpopulation, is minor problem)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(overpopulation, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is minor problem)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(overpopulation, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is major)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(overpopulation, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is global problem)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(overpopulation, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem to world)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(overpopulation, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is major)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(overpopulation, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has state problem)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(overpopulation, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is minor problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(overpopulation, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is major problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(overpopulation, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is major problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(issue, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(inequality, has state problem)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(desertification, is problem brainly)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(desertification, has state problem)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(desertification, is global problem)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(illiteracy, has state problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(desertification, is serious problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(desertification, is major)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(desertification, is major concern)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(overpopulation, is major problem)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(issue, has state problem)