overpopulation: is minor problem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents issue
Weight: 0.66
, crisis
Weight: 0.65
, problem
Weight: 0.65
, topic
Weight: 0.65
, factor
Weight: 0.62
Siblings thyroid problem
Weight: 0.35
, inequality
Weight: 0.34
, mental health problem
Weight: 0.34
, desertification
Weight: 0.33
, illiteracy
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is minor problem 1.00
is minor 0.93
is serious problem 0.88
is major problem 0.87
is big problem 0.83
is problem brainly 0.83
be cause problem 0.82
is serious 0.80
has state problem 0.80
be cause social problem 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(issue, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is minor problem)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(overpopulation, is minor problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(issue, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is minor problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(issue, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is minor problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(desertification, is problem brainly)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is minor problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(desertification, is serious problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is minor problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(desertification, is serious)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is minor problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, be cause problem)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is minor problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(desertification, has state problem)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is minor problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, be cause social problem)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is minor problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, has state problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is minor problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has state problem)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(issue, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(overpopulation, is minor problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is minor problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(overpopulation, is minor problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(inequality, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(inequality, has state problem)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(overpopulation, is minor problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(desertification, is problem brainly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(desertification, is problem brainly)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(overpopulation, is minor problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(desertification, is serious problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(desertification, is serious problem)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(overpopulation, is minor problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(desertification, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(desertification, has state problem)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(overpopulation, is minor problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(illiteracy, be cause problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, be cause problem)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(overpopulation, is minor problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(illiteracy, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, has state problem)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(overpopulation, is minor problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(illiteracy, be cause social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, be cause social problem)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(overpopulation, is minor problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(desertification, is serious) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(desertification, is serious)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(overpopulation, is minor problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(overpopulation, is minor problem)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(overpopulation, is minor problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(overpopulation, is minor)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(overpopulation, is minor problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is minor)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(overpopulation, is minor problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is minor)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(overpopulation, is minor problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is minor)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(overpopulation, is minor problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is major problem)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(overpopulation, is minor problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(overpopulation, has state problem)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(overpopulation, is minor problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(overpopulation, has state problem)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(overpopulation, is minor problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(overpopulation, is big problem)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(overpopulation, is minor problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is big problem)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(overpopulation, is minor problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, has state problem)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(overpopulation, is minor problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is big problem)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(overpopulation, is minor problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is big problem)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(overpopulation, is minor problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is major problem)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(overpopulation, is minor problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(overpopulation, is major problem)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(overpopulation, is minor problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has state problem)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(overpopulation, is minor problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is major problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(overpopulation, is minor problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is minor problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is minor problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(overpopulation, is minor problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is minor problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is minor problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(issue, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is minor problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(inequality, has state problem)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is minor problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(desertification, is problem brainly)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is minor problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(desertification, is serious)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is minor problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(desertification, has state problem)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is minor problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(desertification, is serious problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is minor problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(illiteracy, has state problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is minor problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(illiteracy, be cause problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is minor problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(illiteracy, be cause social problem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(overpopulation, is minor problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(issue, has state problem)