overpopulation: is threat

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents issue
Weight: 0.66
, crisis
Weight: 0.65
, problem
Weight: 0.65
, topic
Weight: 0.65
, factor
Weight: 0.62
Siblings thyroid problem
Weight: 0.35
, inequality
Weight: 0.34
, mental health problem
Weight: 0.34
, desertification
Weight: 0.33
, illiteracy
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is threat 1.00
be threat to unity 0.83
be threat to unity of country 0.82
be danger to society 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, be threat to unity of country)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, be threat to unity)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, be danger to society)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(overpopulation, is threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(illiteracy, be threat to unity of country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, be threat to unity of country)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(overpopulation, is threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(illiteracy, be threat to unity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, be threat to unity)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(overpopulation, is threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(illiteracy, be danger to society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, be danger to society)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(overpopulation, is threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(overpopulation, is threat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(overpopulation, is threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is threat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(overpopulation, is threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is threat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(illiteracy, be threat to unity of country)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(illiteracy, be threat to unity)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(illiteracy, be danger to society)