owl: be a part of animal kingdom

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bird
Weight: 0.76
, predator
Weight: 0.71
, creature
Weight: 0.71
, wild animal
Weight: 0.68
, raptor
Weight: 0.67
Siblings barn owl
Weight: 0.79
, peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.41
, blue bird
Weight: 0.39
, lizard
Weight: 0.39
, raven
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be a part of animal kingdom 1.00
be defined as this animal 0.78
be defined as animal which live in forest 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(wild animal, be defined as animal which live in forest)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(owl, be a part of animal kingdom)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(owl, be a part of animal kingdom)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(wild animal, be defined as animal which live in forest)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(owl, be a part of animal kingdom)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(wild animal, be defined as animal which live in forest)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(owl, be a part of animal kingdom)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(lizard, be defined as this animal)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(wild animal, be defined as animal which live in forest)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(owl, be a part of animal kingdom)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(owl, be a part of animal kingdom)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(owl, be a part of animal kingdom)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(lizard, be defined as this animal)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(lizard, be defined as this animal)

Salient implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(owl, be a part of animal kingdom)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(owl, be a part of animal kingdom)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(owl, be a part of animal kingdom)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(owl, be a part of animal kingdom)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(owl, be a part of animal kingdom)

Typical implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(owl, be a part of animal kingdom)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(owl, be a part of animal kingdom)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(owl, be a part of animal kingdom)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(wild animal, be defined as animal which live in forest)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(owl, be a part of animal kingdom)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(lizard, be defined as this animal)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(owl, be a part of animal kingdom)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(wild animal, be defined as animal which live in forest)