owl: be on list

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bird
Weight: 0.76
, predator
Weight: 0.71
, creature
Weight: 0.71
, species
Weight: 0.68
Siblings barn owl
Weight: 0.79
, snowy owl
Weight: 0.75
, peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.41
, great horned owl
Weight: 0.41
, falcon
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
be on list 1.00
be on endangered list 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(owl, be on list) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(snowy owl, be on list)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(owl, be on list) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(snowy owl, be on endangered list)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(owl, be on list) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(snowy owl, be on list) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(snowy owl, be on list)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(owl, be on list) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(snowy owl, be on endangered list) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(snowy owl, be on endangered list)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(owl, be on list) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(owl, be on list)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(owl, be on list) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(owl, be on endangered list)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(owl, be on list) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(owl, be on endangered list)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(owl, be on list) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(owl, be on endangered list)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(owl, be on list) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(owl, be on endangered list)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(owl, be on list) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(owl, be on list) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(owl, be on list)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(owl, be on list) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(owl, be on list)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(owl, be on list) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(snowy owl, be on list)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(owl, be on list) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(snowy owl, be on endangered list)