owner: close shop

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents manager
Weight: 0.65
, member
Weight: 0.65
, client
Weight: 0.63
, contractor
Weight: 0.60
Siblings shareholder
Weight: 0.62
, breeder
Weight: 0.53
, cuban
Weight: 0.47
, family member
Weight: 0.35
, supervisor
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
close shop 1.00
be close store 0.92
be open store for business 0.80
be at store 0.78
leave close to their employee 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(manager, be close store)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(owner, close shop)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(manager, be at store)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(owner, close shop)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(manager, leave close to their employee)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(owner, close shop)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(manager, be open store for business)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(owner, close shop)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(owner, close shop)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(manager, be close store)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(owner, close shop)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(manager, be open store for business)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(owner, close shop)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(manager, leave close to their employee)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(owner, close shop)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(manager, be at store)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(owner, close shop)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(manager, be close store)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(owner, close shop)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(manager, be at store)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(owner, close shop)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(manager, leave close to their employee)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(owner, close shop)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(manager, be open store for business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(manager, be close store)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(owner, close shop)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(owner, close shop)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(manager, be at store)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(owner, close shop)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(owner, close shop)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(manager, leave close to their employee)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(owner, close shop)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(owner, close shop)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(manager, be open store for business)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(owner, close shop)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(owner, close shop)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(owner, close shop)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(owner, close shop)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(owner, close shop)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(owner, close shop)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(owner, close shop)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(owner, close shop)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(owner, close shop)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(owner, close shop)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(manager, be close store)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(owner, close shop)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(manager, be at store)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(owner, close shop)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(manager, leave close to their employee)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(owner, close shop)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(manager, be open store for business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(owner, close shop)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(manager, be close store)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(owner, close shop)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(manager, be at store)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(owner, close shop)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(manager, leave close to their employee)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(owner, close shop)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(manager, be open store for business)