owner: have have

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents partner
Weight: 0.67
, manager
Weight: 0.65
, member
Weight: 0.65
, client
Weight: 0.63
Siblings proprietor
Weight: 0.63
, shareholder
Weight: 0.62
, breeder
Weight: 0.53
, cuban
Weight: 0.47
, mara
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
have have 1.00
be different in past 0.77
have change 0.76
be with ap1 0.76
be get 1099 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(manager, be different in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(owner, have have)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(owner, have have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(manager, be different in past)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(owner, have have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(manager, be different in past)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(owner, have have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(proprietor, be get 1099)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(manager, be different in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(owner, have have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(owner, have have)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(owner, have have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(proprietor, be get 1099) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(proprietor, be get 1099)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(owner, have have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(owner, have have)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(owner, have have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(owner, be with ap1)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(owner, have have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(owner, be with ap1)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(owner, have have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(owner, be with ap1)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(owner, have have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(owner, be with ap1)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(owner, have have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(owner, have have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(owner, have have)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(owner, have have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(owner, have have)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(owner, have have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(manager, be different in past)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(owner, have have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(proprietor, be get 1099)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(owner, have have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(manager, be different in past)