owner: is draw equity

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents partner
Weight: 0.67
, manager
Weight: 0.65
, member
Weight: 0.65
, client
Weight: 0.63
Siblings proprietor
Weight: 0.63
, shareholder
Weight: 0.62
, breeder
Weight: 0.53
, cuban
Weight: 0.47
, mara
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
is draw equity 1.00
has quality equity 0.89
be negative draw 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(owner, is draw equity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(shareholder, has quality equity)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(owner, is draw equity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(shareholder, has quality equity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(shareholder, has quality equity)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(owner, is draw equity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(owner, is draw equity)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(owner, is draw equity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(owner, has quality equity)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(owner, is draw equity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(owner, has quality equity)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(owner, is draw equity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(owner, has quality equity)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(owner, is draw equity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(owner, be negative draw)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(owner, is draw equity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(owner, be negative draw)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(owner, is draw equity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(owner, has quality equity)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(owner, is draw equity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(owner, be negative draw)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(owner, is draw equity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(owner, be negative draw)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(owner, is draw equity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(owner, is draw equity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(owner, is draw equity)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(owner, is draw equity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(owner, is draw equity)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(owner, is draw equity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(shareholder, has quality equity)