oxidation: is favorable

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents reaction
Weight: 0.63
, chemical reaction
Weight: 0.59
, process
Weight: 0.58
, method
Weight: 0.58
, temperature
Weight: 0.58
Siblings hydrolysis
Weight: 0.36
, fermentation
Weight: 0.35
, digestion
Weight: 0.34
, combustion
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is favorable 1.00
is energetically favorable 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(oxidation, is favorable)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(hydrolysis, is favorable)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(oxidation, is favorable)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(hydrolysis, is energetically favorable)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(oxidation, is favorable)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(hydrolysis, is favorable)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(hydrolysis, is favorable)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(oxidation, is favorable)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(hydrolysis, is energetically favorable)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(hydrolysis, is energetically favorable)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(oxidation, is favorable)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(oxidation, is favorable)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(oxidation, is favorable)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(oxidation, is energetically favorable)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(oxidation, is favorable)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(oxidation, is energetically favorable)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(oxidation, is favorable)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(oxidation, is energetically favorable)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(oxidation, is favorable)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(oxidation, is energetically favorable)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(oxidation, is favorable)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(oxidation, is favorable)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(oxidation, is favorable)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(oxidation, is favorable)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(oxidation, is favorable)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(oxidation, is favorable)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(hydrolysis, is favorable)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(oxidation, is favorable)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(hydrolysis, is energetically favorable)