pa: is second state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents player
Weight: 0.55
, state
Weight: 0.55
, site
Weight: 0.55
, party
Weight: 0.54
, area
Weight: 0.54
Siblings sam
Weight: 0.32
, disneyland
Weight: 0.31
, ga
Weight: 0.31
, dvd player
Weight: 0.31
, delaware
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is second state 1.00
is second most armed state 0.81
is second armed state 0.81
has state state 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(pa, is second state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(delaware, has state state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(pa, is second state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(delaware, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(delaware, has state state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(pa, is second state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(pa, is second state)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(pa, is second state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(pa, is second most armed state)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(pa, is second state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(pa, is second armed state)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(pa, is second state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(pa, has state state)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(pa, is second state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(pa, has state state)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(pa, is second state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(pa, is second most armed state)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(pa, is second state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(pa, is second armed state)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(pa, is second state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(pa, has state state)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(pa, is second state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(pa, is second most armed state)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(pa, is second state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(pa, is second armed state)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(pa, is second state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(pa, is second armed state)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(pa, is second state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(pa, is second most armed state)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(pa, is second state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(pa, has state state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(pa, is second state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(pa, is second state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(pa, is second state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(pa, is second state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(pa, is second state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(pa, is second state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(delaware, has state state)