painting: done in style of renaissance naturalism

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hobby
Weight: 0.67
, art
Weight: 0.65
, job
Weight: 0.63
, artifact
Weight: 0.62
Siblings oil painting
Weight: 0.72
, photograph
Weight: 0.64
, sketch
Weight: 0.64
, canvas
Weight: 0.62
, last supper
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
done in style of renaissance naturalism 1.00
done in style 0.82
be romantic style 0.80
fit neoclassical style 0.78
has physical part style 0.78
be romantic styles 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(painting, done in style of renaissance naturalism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(painting, done in style of renaissance naturalism)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(painting, done in style of renaissance naturalism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(painting, has physical part style)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(painting, done in style of renaissance naturalism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(painting, has physical part style)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(painting, done in style of renaissance naturalism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(painting, has physical part style)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(painting, done in style of renaissance naturalism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(painting, done in style)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(painting, done in style of renaissance naturalism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(painting, be romantic style)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(painting, done in style of renaissance naturalism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(painting, has physical part style)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(painting, done in style of renaissance naturalism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(painting, be romantic style)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(painting, done in style of renaissance naturalism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(painting, be romantic style)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(painting, done in style of renaissance naturalism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(painting, be romantic style)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(painting, done in style of renaissance naturalism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(painting, fit neoclassical style)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(painting, done in style of renaissance naturalism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(painting, done in style)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(painting, done in style of renaissance naturalism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(painting, be romantic styles)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(painting, done in style of renaissance naturalism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(painting, be romantic styles)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(painting, done in style of renaissance naturalism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(painting, be romantic styles)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(painting, done in style of renaissance naturalism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(painting, be romantic styles)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(painting, done in style of renaissance naturalism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(painting, done in style)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(painting, done in style of renaissance naturalism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(painting, fit neoclassical style)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(painting, done in style of renaissance naturalism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(painting, fit neoclassical style)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(painting, done in style of renaissance naturalism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(painting, fit neoclassical style)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(painting, done in style of renaissance naturalism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(painting, done in style)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(painting, done in style of renaissance naturalism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(painting, done in style of renaissance naturalism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(painting, done in style of renaissance naturalism)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(painting, done in style of renaissance naturalism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(painting, done in style of renaissance naturalism)