painting: has physical part style

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hobby
Weight: 0.67
, art
Weight: 0.65
, job
Weight: 0.63
, artifact
Weight: 0.62
Siblings oil painting
Weight: 0.72
, photograph
Weight: 0.64
, sketch
Weight: 0.64
, canvas
Weight: 0.62
, last supper
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part style 1.00
has physical part styles 0.89
fit style 0.86
done in style 0.86
has physical part quick 0.83
fit neoclassical style 0.79
be romantic style 0.78
done in style of renaissance naturalism 0.78
is physical change 0.77
be physical change 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(painting, has physical part style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(painting, has physical part style)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(painting, has physical part style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(painting, has physical part quick)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(painting, has physical part style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(painting, has physical part quick)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(painting, has physical part style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(painting, is physical change)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(painting, has physical part style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(painting, has physical part quick)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(painting, has physical part style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(painting, is physical change)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(painting, has physical part style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(painting, is physical change)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(painting, has physical part style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(painting, be physical change)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(painting, has physical part style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(painting, be physical change)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(painting, has physical part style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(painting, be physical change)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(painting, has physical part style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(painting, is physical change)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(painting, has physical part style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(painting, be physical change)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(painting, has physical part style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(painting, fit style)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(painting, has physical part style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(painting, has physical part quick)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(painting, has physical part style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(painting, fit style)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(painting, has physical part style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(painting, be romantic style)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(painting, has physical part style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(painting, done in style of renaissance naturalism)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(painting, has physical part style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(painting, be romantic style)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(painting, has physical part style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(painting, fit style)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(painting, has physical part style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(painting, fit style)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(painting, has physical part style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(painting, done in style)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(painting, has physical part style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(painting, fit neoclassical style)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(painting, has physical part style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(painting, done in style)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(painting, has physical part style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(painting, be romantic style)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(painting, has physical part style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(painting, be romantic style)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(painting, has physical part style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(painting, done in style of renaissance naturalism)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(painting, has physical part style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(painting, done in style of renaissance naturalism)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(painting, has physical part style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(painting, done in style)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(painting, has physical part style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(painting, fit neoclassical style)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(painting, has physical part style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(painting, done in style)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(painting, has physical part style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(painting, done in style of renaissance naturalism)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(painting, has physical part style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(painting, fit neoclassical style)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(painting, has physical part style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(painting, fit neoclassical style)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(painting, has physical part style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(painting, has physical part style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(painting, has physical part style)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(painting, has physical part style) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(painting, has physical part style)