pakistan: being more developed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents iran
Weight: 0.65
, ally
Weight: 0.60
, land
Weight: 0.60
, friend
Weight: 0.59
, afghanistan
Weight: 0.58
Siblings egypt
Weight: 0.35
, syria
Weight: 0.35
, indonesia
Weight: 0.34
, palestine
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
being more developed 1.00
developed is developing 0.87
was built 0.77
more is developed than indonesia 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(pakistan, being more developed)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(pakistan, being more developed)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(pakistan, being more developed)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(pakistan, developed is developing)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(pakistan, being more developed)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(pakistan, developed is developing)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(pakistan, being more developed)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(pakistan, developed is developing)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(pakistan, being more developed)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(pakistan, more is developed than indonesia)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(pakistan, being more developed)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(pakistan, developed is developing)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(pakistan, being more developed)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(pakistan, was built)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(pakistan, being more developed)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(pakistan, more is developed than indonesia)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(pakistan, being more developed)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(pakistan, was built)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(pakistan, being more developed)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(pakistan, was built)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(pakistan, being more developed)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(pakistan, was built)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(pakistan, being more developed)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(pakistan, more is developed than indonesia)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(pakistan, being more developed)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(pakistan, more is developed than indonesia)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(pakistan, being more developed)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(pakistan, being more developed)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(pakistan, being more developed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(pakistan, being more developed)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(pakistan, being more developed)