pal: be harder than acls

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents organization
Weight: 0.55
, system
Weight: 0.52
, thing
Weight: 0.51
, option
Weight: 0.50
, child
Weight: 0.46
Siblings girl scout
Weight: 0.32
, big brother
Weight: 0.32
, roommate
Weight: 0.31
, lover
Weight: 0.31
, family member
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be harder than acls 1.00
is harder 0.97
be harder than ever 0.96
is difficult 0.79
be slower than ntsc 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(pal, be harder than acls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(pal, be harder than acls)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(pal, be harder than acls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(pal, is harder)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(pal, be harder than acls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(pal, be harder than ever)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(pal, be harder than acls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(pal, is harder)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(pal, be harder than acls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(pal, is harder)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(pal, be harder than acls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(pal, be slower than ntsc)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(pal, be harder than acls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(pal, is harder)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(pal, be harder than acls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(pal, be harder than ever)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(pal, be harder than acls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(pal, be harder than ever)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(pal, be harder than acls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(pal, be slower than ntsc)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(pal, be harder than acls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(pal, be slower than ntsc)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(pal, be harder than acls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(pal, be harder than ever)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(pal, be harder than acls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(pal, be slower than ntsc)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(pal, be harder than acls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(pal, be harder than acls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(pal, be harder than acls)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(pal, be harder than acls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(pal, be harder than acls)