pal: is good for

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents organization
Weight: 0.55
, system
Weight: 0.52
, thing
Weight: 0.51
, option
Weight: 0.50
, child
Weight: 0.46
Siblings girl scout
Weight: 0.32
, big brother
Weight: 0.32
, roommate
Weight: 0.31
, lover
Weight: 0.31
, family member
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is good for 1.00
has quality good 0.86
has physical part quick 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(pal, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(big brother, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(pal, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(lover, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(pal, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(lover, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(lover, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(pal, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(big brother, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(big brother, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(pal, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(pal, is good for)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(pal, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(pal, has quality good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(pal, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(pal, has quality good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(pal, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(pal, has physical part quick)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(pal, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(pal, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(pal, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(pal, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(pal, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(pal, has physical part quick)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(pal, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(pal, has physical part quick)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(pal, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(pal, has physical part quick)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(pal, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(pal, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(pal, is good for)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(pal, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(pal, is good for)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(pal, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(lover, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(pal, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(big brother, has quality good)