palm: get hot

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.63
, company
Weight: 0.60
, pda
Weight: 0.58
, body part
Weight: 0.57
, mobile phone
Weight: 0.57
Siblings computer keyboard
Weight: 0.34
, stylus
Weight: 0.34
, electronic device
Weight: 0.33
, tablet computer
Weight: 0.33
, network device
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
get hot 1.00
is hot 0.96
become hot 0.91
get cold 0.80
get dry 0.77
get red 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(mobile phone, get hot)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(palm, get hot)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(device, get hot)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(palm, get hot)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(palm, get hot)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(device, get hot)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(palm, get hot)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, get hot)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(palm, get hot)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(device, get hot)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(palm, get hot)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, get hot)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(palm, get hot)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(electronic device, get hot)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(mobile phone, get hot)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(palm, get hot)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(palm, get hot)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(device, get hot)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(palm, get hot)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(palm, get hot)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(palm, get hot)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(electronic device, get hot)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(electronic device, get hot)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(palm, get hot)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(palm, get hot)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(palm, get hot)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(palm, become hot)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(palm, get hot)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(palm, is hot)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(palm, get hot)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(palm, is hot)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(palm, get hot)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(palm, become hot)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(palm, get hot)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(palm, become hot)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(palm, get hot)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(palm, become hot)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(palm, get hot)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(palm, get red)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(palm, get hot)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(palm, get cold)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(palm, get hot)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(palm, get red)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(palm, get hot)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(palm, get cold)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(palm, get hot)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(palm, is hot)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(palm, get hot)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(palm, get cold)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(palm, get hot)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(palm, get red)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(palm, get hot)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(palm, get cold)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(palm, get hot)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(palm, get red)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(palm, get hot)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(palm, get dry)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(palm, get hot)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(palm, is hot)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(palm, get hot)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(palm, get dry)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(palm, get hot)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(palm, get dry)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(palm, get hot)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(palm, get dry)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(palm, get hot)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(palm, get hot)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(palm, get hot)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(palm, get hot)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(palm, get hot)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(palm, get hot)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(device, get hot)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(palm, get hot)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(mobile phone, get hot)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(palm, get hot)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(electronic device, get hot)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(palm, get hot)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(device, get hot)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(palm, get hot)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(mobile phone, get hot)