pan: has physical part zones

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cooking utensil
Weight: 0.65
, parameter
Weight: 0.57
, feature
Weight: 0.57
, tool
Weight: 0.56
Siblings frying pan
Weight: 0.80
, wok
Weight: 0.56
, skillet
Weight: 0.53
, baking sheet
Weight: 0.49
, saucepan
Weight: 0.47

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part zones 1.00
has physical part quick 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pan, has physical part zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(frying pan, has physical part zones)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pan, has physical part zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(saucepan, has physical part quick)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(pan, has physical part zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(frying pan, has physical part zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(frying pan, has physical part zones)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(pan, has physical part zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(saucepan, has physical part quick) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(saucepan, has physical part quick)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(pan, has physical part zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(pan, has physical part zones)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(pan, has physical part zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(pan, has physical part zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pan, has physical part zones)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(pan, has physical part zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(pan, has physical part zones)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pan, has physical part zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(saucepan, has physical part quick)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pan, has physical part zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(frying pan, has physical part zones)