pan: is value

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cooking utensil
Weight: 0.65
, parameter
Weight: 0.57
, feature
Weight: 0.57
, tool
Weight: 0.56
Siblings frying pan
Weight: 0.80
, wok
Weight: 0.56
, skillet
Weight: 0.53
, baking sheet
Weight: 0.49
, saucepan
Weight: 0.47

Related properties

Property Similarity
is value 1.00
has quality worth 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(tool, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(pan, is value)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(pan, is value)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(tool, has quality worth)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(pan, is value)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality worth)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(pan, is value)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(frying pan, is value)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(pan, is value)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(skillet, has quality worth)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(tool, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(pan, is value)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(pan, is value)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(pan, is value)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(frying pan, is value)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(frying pan, is value)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(pan, is value)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(skillet, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(skillet, has quality worth)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(pan, is value)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(pan, is value)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(pan, is value)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(pan, is value)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(pan, is value)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(pan, is value)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(pan, is value)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(pan, is value)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(tool, has quality worth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(pan, is value)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(skillet, has quality worth)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(pan, is value)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(frying pan, is value)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(pan, is value)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(tool, has quality worth)