pan: lose nonstick

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cooking utensil
Weight: 0.65
, parameter
Weight: 0.57
, feature
Weight: 0.57
, tool
Weight: 0.56
Siblings frying pan
Weight: 0.80
, wok
Weight: 0.56
, skillet
Weight: 0.53
, baking sheet
Weight: 0.49
, saucepan
Weight: 0.47

Related properties

Property Similarity
lose nonstick 1.00
be called skillet 0.78
be vs skillet 0.78
burn easier in oven 0.76
is coated with grease 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(tool, is coated with grease)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(pan, lose nonstick)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(pan, lose nonstick)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(tool, is coated with grease)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(pan, lose nonstick)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(tool, is coated with grease)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(pan, lose nonstick)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(skillet, be called skillet)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(pan, lose nonstick)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(saucepan, be vs skillet)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(tool, is coated with grease)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(pan, lose nonstick)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(pan, lose nonstick)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(pan, lose nonstick)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(saucepan, be vs skillet)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(saucepan, be vs skillet)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(pan, lose nonstick)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(skillet, be called skillet)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(skillet, be called skillet)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(pan, lose nonstick)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(pan, lose nonstick)

Similarity expansion

0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(pan, lose nonstick)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(pan, burn easier in oven)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(pan, lose nonstick)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(pan, burn easier in oven)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(pan, lose nonstick)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(pan, burn easier in oven)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(pan, lose nonstick)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(pan, burn easier in oven)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(pan, lose nonstick)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(pan, lose nonstick)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(pan, lose nonstick)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(pan, lose nonstick)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(pan, lose nonstick)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(pan, lose nonstick)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(tool, is coated with grease)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(pan, lose nonstick)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(saucepan, be vs skillet)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(pan, lose nonstick)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(skillet, be called skillet)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(pan, lose nonstick)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(tool, is coated with grease)